So What’s Happened to the “Russian Choice”? 161

So What’s Happened to the “Russian Choice”? 161


Melville A.Yu.,

Dr. Sci. (Phil.), Professor, Distinguished Scholar of Russia, Academic Supervisor and Dean, Faculty of Social Science, HSE University, amelville@hse.ru


elibrary_id: 251142 | ORCID: 0000-0002-1414-5783 | RESEARCHER_ID: B-1152-2014


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2003.04.15
Rubric: DIXI!

For citation:

Melville A.Yu. So What’s Happened to the “Russian Choice”? 161 – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No. 4. P. 161-164. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2003.04.15



Abstract

Joining in the discussion about Russia’s political choice, that has unfolded in the Polis’ pages, the author states that fundamental questions: what is the real freedom of such “choice” like? where are the limits of this choice (including chronological limits) to be detected? has the choice gone through? and if not, what’s happened to it? — haven’t been ever answered. According to his estimate, we don’t yet know with all definiteness (as regards Russia, either), what agency is the optimum one for realizing radical socio-political choice (democratic transit), to what degree environment and circumstances predetermine its parameters, to what extent, if one resorts to sociological discourse, the freedom of choice is determined by “structure”, and to what extent — by the “agency” per se. The author, anyway, is convinced of the necessity to take cum grano salis the very idea of democratic transit, or, to be more exact, the “transitological paradigm”, according to which all countries that have “chosen” the democratic road, will sooner or later achieve triumph of democracy. Pointing to the impossibility of just “choosing” an ideal model and of implanting it into an alien social body, he notes, furthermore, that transitions met with are most various, and not all of them are of a democratic character.

 Full Text (электронная версия)

Content No. 4, 2003

See also:


Zamyatin D.N.,
Space and (In)security: ontological models of imagination. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No3

Rogozhina K.A.,
Russian Choice: from What Is Probable to What Is Obvious?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No1

Yanov A.L.,
Slavophiles and Foreign Politics of Russia in the 19th Century.. – Polis. Political Studies. 1998. No6

Lapayeva V.V.,
Why the Intellectual Class of Russia Needs a Party of Its Own. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No3

Ufimtzev V.V.,
But Has There Been Any Choice? 165. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No4

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
3 2016


Neklessa A.I.
Babilon Aeris. Hybrid World and Syrian Maze

 Полный текст
 

Archive

   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991