Political Discourse of Mediacracies: Problems of the Information Epoch

Political Discourse of Mediacracies:
Problems of the Information Epoch

Solovyov A.I.,

Dr. Sci. (Pol. Sci.), Prof., Head of Political Analysis Department, Faculty of Public Administration, Lomonosov Moscow State University. Moscow, Russia, solovyev@spa.msu.ru

elibrary_id: 75920 |

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2004.02.12

For citation:

Solovyov A.I. Political Discourse of Mediacracies: Problems of the Information Epoch . – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No. 2. P. 124-132. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2004.02.12


Inquiring into modern political practices in the context of the information epoch setting in, the author introduces the concept of mediacracy as a particular mode of power organization conducive to the turning of informational relations into a key mechanism of determining the format of political dimensions and of securing interaction between the power and society, and analyzes specific features of the Russian version of mediacratic usages. According to his conclusion, Russian mediacracy has a protodemocratic character. At the same time, the expanding interaction with postdemocratic-type mediacracies has already caused, as is demonstrated in the article, most intensive inner “fermentation” of Russian political culture, which may in due course turn it from the most routine into the most efficient component of political development. Further advancement along this way, as the author supposes, holds real historical prospects in store for our country, and may rid future generations of Russians of facing the danger of finding themselves in a “fourth world”.

 Full Text Мечтаете провести время с удовольствием и иметь возможность заработать деньги? Тогда мы Вам советуем поиграть в игровой автомат 20 Супер Хот https://goxbet1.com/game/demoGame/5105 здесь Вы сможете насладиться высоким уровнем отдачи автомата, за счет этого у Вас будет больше шансов сорвать джекпот. Также Вы можете играть в бесплатную версию слотов в демо режиме!

Content No. 2, 2004

See also:

Shevchenko A.Yu.,
Discourse-Analysis of Political Media-Texts. – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No6

Teterin A.Ye.,
Application of qualitative methods in political-science research (with N.Fairclough’s critical discourse-analysis as example). – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No5

Trakhtenberg A.D.,
Discourse-Analysis of Mass Communication and Paradoxes of Leftist Consciousness. – Polis. Political Studies. 2006. No4

Klemeshev A.P., Ilyin M.V.,
Lost in Translation. Being the Problem. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No5

Kuchinov A.M.,
Approaches and Methods for Survey of Texts and Discourse in Political Science: Classification Experience. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No5



Introducing an article

Polis. Political Studies
4 2010

Melville A.Yu.
Postponed and/or failed democratizations: why and how?

 The article text


   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991