Power in a Small Russian Town: Configuration and Interaction of Major Local Actors

Power in a Small Russian Town:
Configuration and Interaction of Major Local Actors

Chirikova A.Ye.,

Dr. Sci. (Soc.), Principal Researcher, Institute of Sociology of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences, chirikova_a@mail.ru

elibrary_id: 474352 | ORCID: 0000-0002-7980-3150 |

Ledyaev V.G.,

Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Prof., Department of Sociology, National Research University Higher School of Economics, vledyaev@hse.ru

elibrary_id: 143431 | ORCID: 0000-0002-5616-9660 | RESEARCHER_ID: M-6506-2015

Seltser D.G.,

Dr. Sci. (Pol. Sci.), Director of the Institute of Humanitarian and Social Education, Tambov State University, Tambov, Russia, seltser@yandex.ru

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2014.02.07
Rubric: Russia today

For citation:

Chirikova A.Ye., Ledyaev V.G., Seltser D.G. Power in a Small Russian Town: Configuration and Interaction of Major Local Actors. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No. 2. P. 88-105. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2014.02.07


Who governs in a small community? The data of empirical survey conducted in two towns in Permskiy kray allow to conclude that local power structure there is very narrow (elitist). Configuration of the most influential actors in the two towns reflects the domination of the two groups with the largest sets of resources – top figures in the local executive bodies and large business. Political (administrative) elite is the leader in this pair. Mayors are the key figures in local elites, though in other circumstances we admit the leadership of the heads of the district administration which possess comparable or possibly superior resources. Large business, however, remains a visible actor in urban politics and cannot be ignored by politicians. The political opportunities and influence of other groups are very modest, although they can considerably vary and change depending on the personal leadership characteristics of their representatives. The interaction between different actors is quite diverse, dynamic and admits the possibility of various kinds of coalitions. Such coalitions have proved to be very widespread, fairly durable and effective. Although the authoritarian nature of the Russian political regime imposes limitations on particular aspects of urban politics, local actors retain a sufficient range of freedom and autonomy.

power; local politics; urban communities; local elites; urban regimes.

Content No. 2, 2014

See also:

Fadeyeva L.A.,
Urbanity in the political-science dimension. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No1

Kochetkov A.P.,
Authority and elites in a global information society. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No5

Ratz M.V.,
Policy, management, power: a conceptual project of the system of (the state’s) organizational/managerial activities. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No2

Solovyov A.I.,
Power and Politics. Polemic Notes about “Damned Questions” of Political Science. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No6

Gelman V.Ya.,
Regional Power in Today's Russia: Institutes, Regimes, Practices.. – Polis. Political Studies. 1998. No1



Introducing an article

Polis. Political Studies
3 2003

Dyakova Ye.G.
Mass Political Communication in the Agenda-Setting Theory: from Effect to Process

 The article text (электронная версия)


   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991