The Political Dimension of Social Inequality and Poverty (Comparative Experience)

The Political Dimension of Social Inequality and Poverty (Comparative Experience)

Lyublinsky V.V.,

Dr. Sci. (Pol. Sci.), Head, Department of Comparative Analysis of Social Policy, Institute of Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences,

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2015.05.08

For citation:

Lyublinsky V.V. The Political Dimension of Social Inequality and Poverty (Comparative Experience). – Polis. Political Studies. 2015. No. 5. P. 94-106. (In Russ.).


The article is devoted to the analysis of trends and political aspects of social inequality. The author argues that the issues of inequality move to the center of sociopolitical relations. The future of modern civilization largely depends on the transition to positive patterns of inequality and social justice that promotes formation of growth potential and social cohesion. But the process is highly controversial: the type of inequality based on material wealth is still a dominant feature. Since the end of the 20th century social policy in Western countries has undergone inadequate changes. The growing impact of global competition enhances the growth of poverty and social inequality which is associated with significant increase in unemployment, disproportionate trends in income growth of social and professional groups, and cuts in social programs. There are signs of restructuring of inequality patterns. Despite some improvements, social inequality and poverty are significant and remain a serious problem throughout the world, including developed countries. This leads to the rise of the proportion of citizens who experience a direct decline in living standard. The threat is that high levels of inequality define considerable distinctions in social opportunities that create a permanent and deep conflict of social interests which can be transferred to the political level. As a result, the European social model which has contributed to significant poverty reduction, promoted social growth and social cohesion is under increasing pressure. As for Russia, it needs a strategic consolidation with high degree of social cohesion on major issues, especially of internal development. The perspective depends on the amplification of factors of cohesion, and therefore, measures designed to tackle extreme inequality and narrow the space of social injustice. This involves transformation of sociopolitical strategy aimed at the alignment of social opportunities, the growth of progressive taxation of super-high revenues, capital and wealth. Russia needs a socially balanced political strategy with the emphasis on the adequate contribution to the process of modernization from social groups which control the most part of national wealth. Achieving social and political consensus in Russia on these issues is essential and can open the door to stable and long-term social cohesion, effectively address the strategic issues of sustainable development and growth of social welfare.

inequality; poverty; social policy; social justice; social cohesion; social balance.

Content No. 5, 2015

See also:

Lyublinsky V.V.,
Social policy and problems of society’s development. The western experience. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No5

Gorshkov M.K., Tikhonova N.E.,
Russians’ dreams and the reality of demoscopy. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No5

Gorshkov M.K.,
On a new academic journal: «Sociological science and social practice». – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No5

Gaman-Golutvina O.V.,
The concept of identity: movement from the abstract to the concrete. – Polis. Political Studies. 2024. No3

Oleynik A.N.,
Social Policy: the Ways to Achieve Efficiency.. – Polis. Political Studies. 1998. No5



   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991