The Gifted Youth, and Development of New Educational Technologies as a Political Problem

The Gifted Youth, and Development of New Educational Technologies as a Political Problem

Shmeleva E.V.,

Head, Educational Foundation “Talent and Success”,

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2018.02.03

For citation:

Shmeleva E.V. The Gifted Youth, and Development of New Educational Technologies as a Political Problem. – Polis. Political Studies. 2018. No. 2. P. 29-36. (In Russ.).


The article substantiates the necessity of studying the interdisciplinary field during the research of the range of social and ethical issues arising from the development of new technologies and modernization of scientific and technological education. The paper describes basic methods of the value orientation translation when discussing the role of science in achieving socially useful results. Their role is defined in the organization of sustainable communities for the interpretation of the medium- and long-term development prospects for new technologies in the case of selection, taking into account the need for socially significant results, priorities of personal growth of such community members – school and university students. The article specifies the educational features of the basic and further educational system in the context of new priorities for scientific and technological development in the Russian Federation. The paper provides the comparative analysis of the norms and values produced by the leading educational centers for gifted children in the leading countries in the field of scientific and technological development, an attempt to describe the value-oriented model of work with the gifted students within the framework of scientific and technological education. The role of public-private partnership in this process is demonstrated.

giftedness; gifted children; strategy of scientific and technological development; project activity; value of technology; ethical grounds of education.


Branden N. The Power of Self-Esteem: An Inspiring Look at Our Most Important Psychological Resource. 1992. Deerfield Beach, FL: Health Communication, Inc. 1992. 104 p.

Csikszentmihalyi M. Beyond Boredom and Anxiety. (Russ. ed.: Csikszentmihalyi M. Kreativnost’: Psikhologiya Otkrytii i Izobretenii. Moscow: Kar’era Press.1996. 528 p.)

Goleman D. Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ. (Russ. ed.: Goleman D. Emotsional’nyi intellekt. Pochemu on mozhet znachit’ bol’she, chem IQ. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber. 2013. 560 p.)

Goleman D. Focus. The Hidden Driver of Exellence. (Russ. ed.: Goleman D. Fokus. O vnimanii, rassey­annosti i zhiznennom uspekh. Moscow: АСТ: CORPUS. 2015. 384 p.)

Davydov V.V. Teoriya razvivayushchego obucheniya [The Theory of Developmental Learning]. Moscow: INTOR. 1996. 544 p. (In Russ.)

Il’enkov E.V. The School Must be Taught to Think. – Narodnoe obrazovanie. 1964. No. 1. P. 1-16. URL:$p284 (accessed 10.02.2018). (In Russ.).

Is Science Only for the Rich? Around the World, Poverty and Social Background Remain Huge Barriers in Scientific Careers. – Nature. 2016. Vol. 537. No. 7621. P. 466-470.

Psikhologiya odarennosti detei i podrostkov. Pod red. N.S. Leitesa [Psychology of the Giftedness of Children and Adolescents. Ed. by N.S. Leites]. Moscow: Akademiya. 1996. 416 p. (In Russ.)

Seligman M.E.P. Learned Optimism. How to Change Your Mind and Your Life. (Russ. ed.: Seligman M. Kak nauchit’sya optimizmu: Izmenite vzglyad na mir i svoyu zhizn’. Moscow: Alpina Pablisher. 2013. 338 p.)

Stepin V.S. Klassika, neklassika, postneklassika: kriterii razlicheniya [Classics, Non-Classics, Post-Non- Classics: Criteria of Discrimination]. – Postneklassika: filosofiya, nauka, kul’tura [Post-Classics: Philosophy, Science, Culture]. St. Petersburg: Mir. 2009. P. 249-295. (In Russ.) 

Content No. 2, 2018

See also:

Konnov V.I.,
Science Policy Programs: a Paradigm-Based Analysis. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No1

Lapayeva V.V.,
Why the Intellectual Class of Russia Needs a Party of Its Own. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No3

Ibragimova K.A., Barabanov O.N.,
The Right for Development: Innovations as the Global Common. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No2

Degterev D.A., Piskunov D.A., Eremin A.A.,
U.S. – China rivalry in Latin America: at the origins of technological decoupling. – Polis. Political Studies. 2023. No3

Shestopal Ye.B.,
Value Characteristics of the Russian Political Process and Strategy of the Country’s Development. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No2



   2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991