Prolongation of the “Moscow-Centric” Russian Space: pro et contra

Prolongation of the “Moscow-Centric” Russian Space:
pro et contra

Druzhinin A.G.,

Professor, Research Professor, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University; Director, North-Caucasus Research Institute of Economic and Social Problems, Southern Federal University,

elibrary_id: 149025 |

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2018.05.04

For citation:

Druzhinin A.G. Prolongation of the “Moscow-Centric” Russian Space: pro et contra. – Polis. Political Studies. 2018. No. 5. P. 29-42. (In Russ.).


The article analyzes the “Moscow-centric space” as a socio-geographic cultural-axiological and politico-economic phenomenon, and studies its retrospective review, factors and major symptoms. The author assesses the feasibility and opportunity for Russia to be ‘un-Moscowed’, as well as the opportunity for Moscow to be “de-capitalized”, concerning the geo-economic and geopolitical realities. The article analyzes the historical trend of forming ‘Moscow-centric’ model of the organization of the Russian space. It is shown that the post-Soviet rapid growth of socio-economic asymmetry in the development of Moscow and “non-capital” regions of the Russian Federation leads not only to stagnation and degradation of the periphery, but also to the deepening of the crisis of Moscow itself. The latter is manifested in the reduction of migration growth of the population of the Moscow region, as well as the significant decrease in the share of Moscow residents in the money income of the Russian population, including the property income. The author emphasizes the economic and geopolitical risks of the invariants of “un-Moscowing” of Russia. Special attention is paid to the need, on the one hand, to re-develop the high-problematic Russian territories (including the border and maritime ones, as well as ones with the active cross-border connections), on the other hand – to implement very balanced attitude to the prospect of a polycentric development of the country.

Russian space; center; periphery; polarization; Moscow-centric development; Moscow; human geography.


Agafonov N.T., Lavrov S.B., Khorev B.S. Some Erroneous Concepts in Urban Studies. – Proceedings of the Russian Geographical Society. 1982. No. 6. P. 533-539. (In Russ.)

Balatskii E.V., Gusev A.B. Syndrome of the Metropolitan Metropolis in the Russian Economic Space. – Spatial Economics. 2007. No. 4. P. 5-25. (In Russ.)

Bezrukov L.A. Economic and Geographical Position of Siberia in Russia and the World. – Geography and Natural Resources. 2014. No. 3. P. 5-15. (In Russ.)

Braudel F. Civilisation matérielle, économie et capitalisme, XVe-XVIIIe siècle (Russ. ed. Braudel F. Material’naya tsivilizatsiya, ekonomika i kapitalizm, XV-XVIII vv. T. 1. Struktury povsednevnosti: vozmozhnoe i nevozmozhnoe. Moscow: Ves Mir Publishers. 2007. 592 p.)

Busygina I.M. Center-Periphery Model, Federalism, and Problems of Modernization of Russian State. – Political Science (RU). 2011. No. 4. P. 53-70. (In Russ.)

Denisenko M.B., Stepanova A.V. Population Dynamics in Moscow over the Past 140 Years. – Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 6. Economics. 2013. No. 3. P. 88-97. (In Russ.)

Druzhinin A. Russia in Modern Eurasia: The Vision of a Russian Geographer. – Quaestiones Geographicae. 2016. Vol. 35. No. 3. P. 31-39.

Druzhinin A.G. Metropolises and Metropolization in Modern Russia: Conceptual Approaches in the Context of Political Geography. – Izvestiya RAN. Seriya Geograficheskaya. 2014. No. 1. P. 19-27. (In Russ.)

Fedorov G.M., Mikhailov A.S., Kuznetsova T.Yu. The Influence of the Sea on the Economic Development and Settlement Structure in the Baltic Sea Region. – Balt. Reg. 2017. Vol. 9. No. 2. P. 7-27. (In Russ.) English version: Fedorov G.M., Mikhailov A.S., Kuznetsova T.Yu. The Influence of the Sea on the Economic Development and Settlement Structure in the Baltic Sea Region. – Baltic Region. 2017. Vol. 9. No. 2. P. 4-18.

Gladkii Yu.N. Rossiya v labirintakh geograficheskoi sud’by [Russia in the Maze of Geographical Fate]. St. Petersburg: St. Peterburg: Yuridicheskii tsentr Press. 2006. 846 p. (In Russ.)

Gumilev L.N. Drevnyaya Rus’ i Velikaya step’ [Ancient Rus and the Great Steppe]. Moscow: Mysl’. 1989. 766 p. (In Russ.)

Haggett P. Geography – A Global Synthesis. (Russ. ed.: Haggett P. Geografiya: sintez sovremennykh  znanii. Moscow: Progress. 1979. 685 p.)

Il’in I.A. O Rossii. Tri rechi. 1926-1933 [About Russia. Three Speeches]. Sophia: Za Rossiyu. 1934. 78 p. (In Russ.)

Kaganskii V.L. Kul’turnyi landshaft i sovetskoe obitaemoe prostranstvo: Sbornik statei [Cultural Landscape and Soviet Habited Space: collected articles]. Moscow: New Literary Observer. 2001. 576 p. (In Russ.)

Kalutskov V.N. Cultural and Geographical Zoning of Russia: Geoconceptual Approach. – Pskovskii regionologicheskii zhurnal. 2015. No. 22. P. 85-94. (In Russ.)

Khorev B.S. Problemy gorodov [Problems of Cities]. Moscow: Mysl’. 1975. 428 p. (In Russ.)

Khorev B.S.Regional’naya politika v SSSR [Regional Policy in the USSR]. Moscow: Mysl’. 1989. 285 p. (In Russ.)

Klemeshev A.P., Korneevets V.S., Palmowski T., Studzieniecki T., Fedorov G.M. Approaches to the Definition of the Baltic Sea Region. – Balt. Reg. 2017. Vol. 9. No. 4. P. 7-28. https://doi. org/10.5922/2074-9848-2017-4-1 (In Russ.) English version: Klemeshev A.P., Korneevets V.S., Palmowski T., Studzieniecki T., Fedorov G.M. Approaches to the Definition of the Baltic Sea Region. – Baltic Region. 2017. Vol. 9. No. 4. P. 4-20.

Kolosov V.A., Vendina O.I., Borodulina N.A., Seredina E.V., Fedorov D.R., Klimanov V.V. The Creation of New Business Environment in Moscow: Trends and Contradictions. – Izvestiya AN. Seriya geograficheskaya. 1998. No. 5. P. 5-12. (In Russ.)

Kolosov V.A., Vendina O.I., Ekkert D. Regional’nye tsentry v usloviyakh globalizatsii: problemy sravni- tel’nykh issledovanii [Regional Centers in the Context of Globalization: Problems of Comparative Studies]. – Krupneishie goroda i vyzovy globalizatsii. Pod red. V.A. Kolosova, D. Ekkerta [Largest Cities and Challenges of Globalization. Ed. by V.A. Kolosov, D. Ekkert]. Moscow, Smolensk: Oikumena. 2003. P. 5-16. (In Russ.)

Kuznetsova O.V. Moscow as the Federal Regional Policy Object. – Scientific Articles – Institute of Economic Forecasting Russian Academy of Sciences. 2016. No. 1. P. 606-621. (In Russ.)

Lappo G.M. Formirovanie seti gorodov na territorii Rossii [Formation of a Network of Cities in Russia]. – Problemy urbanizatsii na rubezhe vekov. Otv. red. A.G. Makhrova. Smolensk: Oikumena. 2002. P. 19-34.

Makarenko V.P. The ‘Own Strange’: Concept of Russian Power. – The Political Conceptology: Journal of Metadisciplinary Research. 2010. No. 2. P. 130-174. (In Russ.)

Makhrova A., Nefedova T., Treivish A. Moscow Agglomeration and the “New Moscow”. – Pro et Contra. 2012. No. 6. Vol. 57. P. 19-32. (In Russ.)

Mezhdu domom... i domom. Vozvratnaya prostranstvennaya mobil’nost’ naseleniya Rossii [Between the House ... and the House. Return Spatial Mobility of the Population of Russia]. Moscow: New Chronograph Publishing. 2016. 504 p. (In Russ.)

Pertsik E.N. Geografiya gorodov (geourbanistika) [The Geography of Cities (Geourbanistics)]. Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola Publishers. 1991. 319 p. (In Russ.)

Pulyarkin V.A. Lokal’nye tsivilizatsii vo vremeni i v prostranstve [Local Civilizations in Time and in Space]. Moscow: Eslan. 2005. 536 p. (In Russ.)

Rodoman B.B. Strana permanentnogo kolonializma [Country of Permanent Colonialism]. – Transformatsiya rossiiskogo prostranstva: sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie i prirodno-resursnye factory (polimasshtabnyi analiz) [Transformation of the Russian Space: Socio-Economic and Natural Resource Factors (Multiscale Analysis)]. Moscow: Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences. 2008. P. 130-138. (In Russ.)

Savitskii P.N. Kontinent-Okean (Rossiya i mirovoi rynok) [Continent-Ocean (Russia and the World Market)]. – Kontinent-Evraziya [Continent Eurasia]. Moscow: Agraf. 1997. P. 398-418. (In Russ.)

Smirnyagin L.V. Obshchestvennaya geografiya. Federalizm. Regionalizm [Human Geography. Federalism. Regionalism]. Moscow: KomKniga. 2005. 464 p. (In Russ.)

Sushchii S.Ya., Druzhinin A.G. Ocherki geografii russkoi kul’tury [Essays on Geography of Russian Culture]. Rostov on Don: Southern Federal University Publishers. 1994. 576 p. (In Russ.)

Taylor P., Walker D., Catalano G., Hoyler M. Diversity and Power in the World City Network. – Cities. 2002. No. 19. P. 231-241.

Treivish A.I. Gorod, raion, strana i mir. Razvitie Rossii glazami stranoveda [City, District, Country and World. the Development of Russia Through the Eyes of the Country Expert]. Moscow: New Chronograph Publishing. 2009. 372 p. (In Russ.)

Turovskii R.F. Subnational Regions in Global Politics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No. 2. P. 99-117. (In Russ.) URL:

Vendina O.I. Migrants in Russian Cities. – Otechestvennye zapiski. 2012. Vol. 3. No. 48. P. 216-229. (In Russ.)

Vodarskii Ya.E. Naselenie Rossii v kontse XVII – nachale XVIII veka [The Population of Russia in the Late XVII – Early XVIII Century]. Moscow: Nauka. 1977. 263 p. (In Russ.)

Zamyatin D.N. Geocracy. Eurasia as the Image, Symbol and Project of Russian Civilization. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No. 1. P. 71-99. (In Russ.)

Zimin A.A., Khoroshkevich A.L. Rossiya vremen Ivana Groznogo [Russia of the Times of Ivan the Terrible]. Moscow: Nauka. 1982. 184 p. (In Russ.)

Zubarevich N.V. Capital Status Rent. – Pro et Contra. 2012. No. 6. Vol. 57. P. 6-19. (In Russ.)

Zubarevich N.V. Crises in Post-Soviet Russia: A Regional Projection. – Regional Research. 2015. No. 1. Vol. 47. P. 23-31. (In Russ.) 


Content No. 5, 2018

See also:

Ratz M.V.,
How We Perceive the World We Live In (On Methodological Problems of Interpreting the Post-Industrial World). – Polis. Political Studies. 2000. No3

Kostyrev A.G.,
The intelligent power, public diplomacy, and social networks as a factors of international politics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No2

Rethinking Modernity (Materials of an International Scientific Conference) (II). – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No3

Sergeev V.M., Kuzmin A.S., Alekseyenkova Ye.S., Kazantzev A.A.,
Moscow and St. Petersburg as Centers of Attraction of Social Nets. – Polis. Political Studies. 2007. No2

Shishkov V.V.,
Empire as a Notion and Concept of Modern Political Science: The Problems of Interpretation. – Polis. Political Studies. 2018. No4



   2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991