Bastions of Tradition:
The Ethnic Factor and Machine Politics in the Russian Regions
Senior Researcher, Center for Comparative History and Politics Studies, Perm State National Research University; Professor, Ufa State Petroleum Technological University, firstname.lastname@example.org
elibrary_id: 482517 |
Of those political machines created by governors in the mid-1990s in the Russian regions, the most effective were those in the national republics. Several reasons contributed to this, the main ones being the density of patronage networks among the ethnic minorities in the countryside, the economic legacy of the Soviet era, as well as the politicization and institutionalization of ethnicity. All this allowed the regional elites to integrate ethnic minorities into the clientelistic structure of distributing symbolic and material goods in exchange for their electoral support. However, at the present stage the autonomy of the national republics has been reduced by the federal authorities. Based on analysis of the results of 2018 presidential elections, the article examines the electoral consequences of changes in the relations between the center and the regions and of changes in the functioning of regional political machines. The analysis enabled us to realize the diversification of the electoral behavior of ethnic minorities in different republics. Based on a comparative analysis of five regions of Russia, the author explains the reasons for this diversification.
Auyero J. 2001. Poor People’s Politics: Peronist Survival Networks and the Legacy of Evita. Durham: Duke University Press. 296 p.
Bader M., Ham C. van. 2015. What Explains Regional Variation in Election Fraud? Evidence from Russia: a Research Note. – Post-Soviet Affairs. Vol. 31. No. 6. P. 514-528. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2014.969023
Brie M. 2004. The Moscow Political Regime: The Emergence of a New Urban Political Machine. – The Politics of Local Government in Russia. Ed. By A. B. Evans Jr. and V. Gel’man. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. P. 203-234.
Chandra K. 2004. Why Ethnic Parties Succeed: Patronage and Ethnic Head Counts in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 368 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108573481
Frye T., Reuter O.J., Szakonyi D. 2014. Political Machines at Work: Voter Mobilization and Electoral Subversion in the Workplace. – World Politics. Vol. 66. No. 2. P. 195-228. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004388711400001X
Golosov G. 2011. Russia’s Regional Legislative Elections, 2003-2007: Authoritarianism Incorporated. – Europe-Asia Studies. Vol. 63. No. 3. P. 397-414. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2011.557533
Golosov G. 2013 Machine Politics: The Concept and Its Implications for Post-Soviet Studies. – Demokratizatsiya: Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization. Vol. 21. No. 4. P. 459-480.
Goodnow R., Moser R., Smith T. 2014. Ethnicity and Electoral Manipulation in Russia. – Electoral Studies. Vol. 36. P. 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2014.05.005
Hale H. 1999. Machine Politics and Institutionalized Electorates: A Comparative Analysis of Six Duma Elections in Bashkortostan. – Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politic. Vol. 15. No. 4. P. 70-110.
Hale H. 2003. Explaining Machine Politics in Russia’s Regions: Economy, Ethnicity, and Legacy. – Post-Soviet Affairs. Vol. 19. No. 3. P. 228-263. https://doi.org/10.2747/1060-586X.19.3.228
Hale H. 2005. Regime Cycles: Democracy, Autocracy, and Revolution in Post-Soviet Eurasia. – World Politics. Vol. 58. No. 1. P. 133−165.
Hale H. 2007. Correlates of clientelism: political economy, politicized ethnicity and post-communist transition. – Patrons, Clients, and Policies. Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition.
Ed. By H. Kitschelt and S. Wilkinson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. P. 227-250. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511585869.010
Hale H. 2008. The Foundations of Ethnic Politics: Separatism of States and Nations in Eurasia and The World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 282 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790669
Horowitz D. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press. 707 p.
Mandelbaum S. 1965. Boss Tweed’s New York. NY: Wiley. 196 p.
Matsuzato K. 2001. From Ethno-Bonapartism to Centralized Caciquismo: Characteristics and Origins of the Tatarstan Political Regime, 1900-2000. – The Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics. Vol. 17. No. 4. P. 43-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/714003590
Merriam Ch. 1929. Chicago: A More Intimate View of Urban Politics. NY: Macmillan. 305 p.
Myagkov M., Ordeshook P., Shakin D. 2010. The Forensics of Election Fraud. Russia and Ukraine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 289 p.
Nichter S. 2008. Vote Buying or Turnout Buying? Machine Politics and the Secret Ballot. – American Political Science Review. Vol. 102. No. 1. P. 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055408080106
Scott J. 1969. Corruption, Machine Politics, and Political Change. – American Political Science Review. Vol. 63. No. 4. P. 1142-1158. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400263247
Sharafutdinova G. 2015. Elite Management in Electoral Authoritarian Regimes: A View from Bashkortostan and Tatarstan. – Central Asia Affairs. Vol. 2. No. 2. P. 117-139. https://doi.org/10.1163/22142290-00202001
Sharafutdinova G. 2013. Getting the “Dough” and Saving the Machine: Lessons from Tatarstan. – Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization. Vol. 21. No. 4. P. 507-529.
Simpser A. 2013. Why Governments and Parties Manipulate Elections: Theory, Practice, and Implications (Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 284 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139343824
Stokes S. 2005. Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina. – American Political Science Review. Vol. 99. No. 3. P. 315-325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051683
Gallyamov R. R. 1998. Political Elites of the Russian Republics: Features of Transformation in the Post-Soviet Period. – Polis. Political Studies. No. 2. P. 108-115. (In Russ.)
Gel’man V. 2006. Return of Leviathan? (The Politics of Decentralization in Modern Russia). – Polis. Political Studies. No. 2. P. 90-109. (In Russ.)
Gel’man V. 2008. Dinamika subnacional’nogo avtoritarizma: Rossiya v sravnitel’noj perspective [The Dynamics of Subnational Authoritarianism: Russia in a Comparative Perspective]. St. Petersburg.: Europe University at the St. Petersburg Press. 32 p. (In Russ.)
Gilev A., Semenov A., Shevcova I. 2017. “Political Machines” and Their “Drivers”: Electoral Administration at the Local Level. – Politeia. No. 3 (86). P. 62-80. (In Russ.)
Shkel S. 2017. Recruitment of Local Elites in the Conditions of Subnational Authoritarianism: the Experience of the Republic of Bashkortostan. – Political Science (RU). No. 4. P. 137-160. (In Russ.)
Round Table of the «Polis» Journal, Gaman-Golutvina O.V., Avdonin V.S., Sergeyev S.A., Chernikova V.V., Sidenko O.A., Sokolov A.V., Evdokimov N.A., Tupaev A.V., Slatinov V.B., Zhukov I.K., Kozlova N.N., Rassadin S.V., Chugrov S.V.,
Regional political processes: how «subjective» are subjects of the RF. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No5
Regional Political Regimes in Russia: to the Methodology of Analysis. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No2
Electoral Malpractices around the World. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No5
Sirotkina E.V., Karandashova S.A.,
Loyalty of Elites and Gubernatorial Elections: the Role of Pre-electoral Conflicts in the Voting Outcome. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No6
The 2012-2014 Party Reform and the Structure of the Electoral Divides in Russia’s Regions. – Polis. Political Studies. 2015. No4