“Imagined Geopolitics” in the Russian Media Discourse on Coronavirus
National Research University Higher School of Economics, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia, email@example.com
elibrary_id: 417954 | ORCID: 0000-0001-8336-1044 | RESEARCHER_ID: L-6641-2015
The author thanks computer linguists A.V. Kozlova, V.S. Bazhenova, D.B. Lipskaya, and M.A. Mokrova, graduates of the educational program “Fundamental and Applied Linguistics” of the Higher School of Economics in Nizhny Novgorod, for their help in working with empirical data.
This article analyzes, through seeing how Russian media reported about the COVID-19 pandemic, the images thus created of different countries. It approaches this issue in the context of popular critical geopolitics. 465 texts from Russian media (in the period 01.01.2019–03.20.2020) were identified based on the keyword “coronavirus” and processed using computer linguistics. For eastern countries (China, Iran, South Korea and Japan) and western ones (USA, Italy, Spain, France), as well as for “Russia”, semantic fields were reconstructed. Based on the analysis of semantic fields, the images the media created of countries facing the pandemic were interpreted. It turned out that the east was written about in the context of a border beyond which there is a danger of infection. The image of eastern countries in the news about the coronavirus is consistent with the prevailing media images of the east as a distant and little-known geopolitical space. The media discourse on the pandemic in China contains people and viruses as storytelling actors, which, according to the author of the article, may indicate that the outdated strategy of the “demonization” of China (as a habitat for the infection) remains strong. Western countries in the media discourse on coronavirus are lined up in a hierarchy. The United States and France are personified directly based on their political leaders. Ordinary people suffering from coronavirus disappear in the media discourse on the pandemic in the US; all media attention is focused on President Trump. The image of the United States is one of a hegemonic country. The image of France is semantically one of the most complex and ambivalent. The image of Spain is being reconstructed through the suffering of people in a pandemic, as well as through the participation of the state in protecting citizens from the infection. The image of Italy is one of a close, sympathetic, and vulnerable country. Russia, in the discourse of Russian media at the initial stage of the pandemic, is constructed as not infected, instead resisting the pandemic. It turns out that the geopolitical media discourse in a pandemic preserves the most typical intentions.
Bayulgen O., Arbatli E. 2013. Cold War Redux in US–Russia Relations? the Effects of US Media Framing and Public Opinion of the 2008 Russia–Georgia War. – Communist and Post-Communist Studies. Vol. 46. No. 4. P. 513-527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2013.08.003
Cohen S. 2011. Folk Devils and Moral Panics: The Creation of the Mods and Rockers. London: Routledge.
Cooke N.A. 2018. Fake News and Alternative Facts. Information Literacy in a Post-Truth Era. Chicago: ALA Editions.
Ellul J. 1973. Propaganda: The Formation of Men’s Attitudes. N.Y.: Vintage. 352 p.
Entman R.M. 2008. Theorizing Mediated Public Diplomacy: The U.S. Case. – The International Journal of Press/Politics. Vol. 13. No. 2. P. 87-102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161208314657
Herman E., Chomsky N., Mullen A. 2009. The Propaganda Model after 20 Years: Interview with Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky. – Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture. Vol. 6. No. 2. P. 12-22. https://doi.org/10.16997/wpcc.121
Ibarra P.R. 2009. Problematic Sociality: Uncertainty and the Study of Social Problems. – American Sociologist. Vol. 40. P. 79-88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-009-9063-4
Kolossov V. 2013. The Vision of Europe and the World from Large Powers: The Case of BRIC. – Geografia Polonica. No. 2. P. 89-98. https://doi.org/10.7163/GPol.2013.10
McCombs M. 2004. Setting the Agenda: The Mass Media and Public Opinion. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
Michel J.B., Shen Y.K., Aiden A.P., Veres A., Gray M.K., Pickett J.P., Aiden E. L. 2011. Quantitative Analysis of Culture Using Millions of Digitized Books. – Science. Vol. 331. No. 6014. P. 176-182. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199644
Petersson B., Persson E. 2011. Coveted, Detested and Unattainable? Images of the US Superpower Role and Self-Images of Russia in Russian Print Media Discourse. – International Journal of Cultural Studies. Vol. 14. No. 1. P. 71-89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877910384185
Pjesivac I., Luther C. A., Imre I. 2018. Constructing an Image of the United States in the British and French Editorials about Wikileaks. – The Journal of International Communication. Vol. 24. No. 2. P. 216-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/13216597.2018.1492432
Tsygankov A. 2017. The Dark Double: The American Media Perception of Russia as a Neo-Soviet Autocracy. 2008-2014. – Politics. Vol. 37. No. 1. P. 19-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395715626945
Wang Q. 2016. A Comparative Case Study: Network Agenda Setting in Crisis and Non-Crisis News. – Global media and China. Vol. 1. No. 3. P. 208-233. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059436416668870
Anderson B. 2001. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (Russ. ed.: Anderson B. Voobrazhaemye soobshchestva. Razmyshleniya ob istokakh i rasprostranenii natsionalizma. Moscow: KANON-Press-Ts; Kuchkovo pole).
Bonch-Osmolovskaya A.A. 2015. Cultural Studies in the National Corps of the Russian Language, to the Statement of the Problem: Three Centuries of Russian Roads. – Trudy instituta russkogo yazyka im. V.V. Vinogradova. No. 6. P. 605-641. (In Russ.)
Czinczin Czin. 2016. The Historical and Symbolical Representation of China in the Russian Culture on Material of Printed Media. – Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities & Sciences. No. 181. P. 45-49. (In Russ.).
Ilyin M.V. 2011. Annular Model of the Global Geopolitical Expanse. – Polis. Political Studies. No. 2. P. 129-133. (In Russ.)
Ischenko A.A. 2014. The Foreign Policy Component of the Image of the United States in the Mass Consciousness of Russian Citizens in 2001-2004 (Based on Materials from Domestic Media). – Vestnik Cherepovetskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. No. 1. P. 30-33. (In Russ.)
Klimenko D.A. 2010. The Main Components of the Country Image and Technology of Its Promotion: On the Example of the Formation of the Image of Italy in Russia. – Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 10. Zhurnalistika. No. 1. P. 165-181. (In Russ.)
Kolosov V.A. 2011. Critical Geopolitics: The Basics of the Concept and the Experience of Its Application in Russia. – Political Science (RU). No. 4. P. 31-52. (In Russ.)
Kolosov V.A., Borodulina N.A., Vendina O.I., Galkina T.A., Zayatz D.V., Yur Ye.S. Geopolitical Vision of the World in Mass-Media. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No. 3. P. 33-49. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2003.03.04
Larionova M.V. 2010. Russia and Spain in the Mirror of Newspaper and Journalistic Discourse: Metaphors and Stereotypes. – MGIMO Review of International Relations. No. 2. P. 247-254. (In Russ.)
Lipina M.A. 2018. Features of Iran’s Image Formation in Modern Russian Media (Political Metaphor). – Izv. Saratov Univ. (N. S.), Ser. Philology. Journalism. Vol. 18. No. 4. P. 403-407. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18500/1817-7115-2018-18-4-403-407
Lyashevskaya O.N., Sharov S.A. 2009. Chastotnyy slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo yazyka (na materialakh Natsional’nogo korpusa russkogo yazyka) [Frequency Dictionary of the Modern Russian Language (based on the materials of the National Corps of the Russian Language)]. Moscow: Azbukovnik. (In Russ.).
Novikov L.A. 2001. Semanticheskoye pole kak leksicheskaya kategoriya. Semanticheskoye pole kak tekstovaya struktura [Semantic Field as a Lexical Category. Semantic Field as a Text Structure]. – Izbrannyye trudy. Vol. II: Esteticheskiye aspekty yazyka. Miscellanea [Selected Works. Vol. II: Aesthetic Aspects of Language. Miscellanea]. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo RUDN. P. 554-570. (In Russ.)
Okunev I.Yu. 2012. Critical Geopolitics and the Postcritical Shift in the Research Paradigm of Geopolitics. – Kul’turnaya i gumanitarnaya geografiya. Vol. 1. No. 2. P. 152-158. (In Russ.)
Shi Xia. 2007. Yazykovye sredstva demonizatsii obraza Kitaya v rossiiskikh SMI [Linguistic Means of Demonizing the Image of China in the Russian Media]. –Yazyk, soznanie, kommunikatsiya. Otv. red. V.V. Krasnykh, A.I. Izotov [Language, Consciousness, Communication: collected articles. Ed. by V.V. Krasnykh, A.I. Izotov]. Moscow: MAKS Press. P. 22-33. (In Russ.)
Sobiyanek K.L. 2010. Image of Russia and Stereotypes of its Perception in Poland (On the Basis of Publications by Andrzej de Lazari). – Political Linguistics Journal. No. 4 (34). P. 166-171. (In Russ.)
Tretyakov A.O., Filatova O.G., Zhuk D.V., Gorlushkina N.N., Puchkovskaya A.A. 2018. Method for Determining Russian-Language Fake News Using Elements of Artificial Intelligence. – International Journal of Open Information Technologies. Vol. 6. No. 12. P. 99-105. (In Russ.)
Tsetskhladze L.T. 2016. The Image of the Republic of Korea in the Russian-Language Media (On the Example of Online Newspaper Lenta.ru). – Mediasreda. No. 11. P. 120-125. (In Russ.)
Vorobyova E.A. 2018. The Beautiful Country of Japan, the Beautiful Country of Russia: The Formation and Perception of the Image of the Enemy. – Idei i idealy. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 164-182. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17212/2075-0862-2018-1.1-164-182
Zamyatin D.N. 2012. Humanitarian Geography: Main Directions, Categories, Methods. – Kul’turnaya i gumanitarnaya geografiya. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 11-26. (In Russ.)
EU Security: Micro-Aggression with Macro-Consequences. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No5
Kolosov V.A., Sebentzov A.B.,
Northern Caucasus in the Russian geopolitical discourse. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No2
Mchedlova M.M., Kazarinova D.B.,
COVID-19 Pandemic Challenge and Religion: Ontology vs Politics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No4
COVID-19 Pandemic: Challenges to Global Health – is Humanist Globolocal Biopolitics Possible?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No6
Geopolitics: classical and modern. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No2