Replacing the Myth: “Moment of Truth” for the State

Replacing the Myth:
“Moment of Truth” for the State




DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2021.05.13

For citation:

Telin K.O. Replacing the Myth: “Moment of Truth” for the State. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No. 5. P. 184-191. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2021.05.13



Abstract

The review considers the collective monograph “The State in Political Science: Transformations in a Twenty-First Century Cocial Context”, published in 2020 by leading experts in the field of political science and public administration. The authors offer a detailed overview of contemporary trends in international and national state development, striving to advance in the conceptualization of the state as a category of social sciences. Despite the fact that the 15 chapters presented in the work are very different both in design and in the subject matter of their research, the monograph as a whole can provoke a detailed public discussion dedicated to the most topical problems of state building as well as scientific study into how those challenges may present themselves in the modern conjuncture of political and international relations (this is an area which remains without proper study in Russian science). The excessive breadth of the analytical horizon and the complexity of the presentation do not block it from being perceived as a promising springboard for deepening research areas demanded in academia. 

Keywords
public governance, sovereignty, globalization, crisis, development, political process, world order, political myth, regional politics, federalism.


References

Bakan J. 2020. The New Corporation: How “Good” Corporations Are Bad for Democracy. NY: Penguin Random House. 240 p.

Ciaglia S., Fuest C., Heinemann F. 2018. What a Feeling?! How to Promote ‘European Identity. EconPol Policy Report No. 9. Vol. 2. URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/EconPol_Policy_Report_9_2018_European_ Identity.pdf (accessed 16.05.2021).

Ciaglia S., Fuest C., Heinemann F. 2020. Fostering European Identity. – European Integration Studies. No. 14. P. 9-25. https://www.doi.org/10.5755/j01.eis.1.14.25492

Mann M. 1984. The Autonomous Power of the State: Its Origins, Mechanisms and Results. – European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie / Europäisches Archiv für Soziologie. Vol. 25. No. 2. P. 185-213.

Pierson P. 2000. Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. – American Political Science Review. Vol. 94. No. 2. P. 251-267. https://doi.org/10.2307/2586011

Prabhu J. 2021. How Should A Government Be? The New Levers of State Power. London: Profile Books. 336 p.

Royuela V. 2019. Construction of a Composite Index of European Identity. – Social Indicators Research. Vol. 148. P. 831-861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-019-02226-5

Schwab K., Malleret T. 2020. COVID-19: The Great Reset. Zurich: World Economic Forum. 280 p.

 

Gel’man V. 2001. Post-Soviet Political Transformations: Draft for Theory. – Social Sciences and Contemporary World. No. 2. P. 55-69. (In Russ.)

Gel’man V. 2019. Nedostoinoe pravlenie. Politika v sovremennoi Rossii [Bad Governance: Politics in Modern Russia]. Saint Petersburg: EUSP Press. 254 p. (In Russ.)

Gosudarstvo v politicheskoy nauke i sotsialnoy realnosti 21 veka [The State in Political Science: Transformations in a Twenty-First Century Social Context]. 2020. Ed. by I.S. Semenenko, V.V. Lapkin, V.I. Pantin. Moscow: Ves Mir. 386 p. (In Russ.)

Jessop B. 2019. The State: Past, Present, Future. (Russ. ed.: Jessop B. Gosudarstvo: proshloe, nastoyashchee i budushchee. Moscow: Izdatel’skii dom “Delo”. 504 p.)

Khenkin S. 2018. Politico-Territorial Organization of Spain: Old Problems and New Challenges. – Politeia. No. 4. P. 162-179. (In Russ.) https://www.doi.org/10.30570/2078-5089-2018-91-4-162-179

Mirkin J. 2020. Pravila neostorozhnogo obrashcheniya s gosudarstvom [Rules of Careless Handling with State]. Moscow: AST. 256 p. (In Russ.)

Ross C. 2011. Russian Federalism in Crisis. – Political Science (RU). No. 4. P. 71-96. (In Russ.)

Volkov V. 2018. Gosudarstvo, ili Tsena poryadka [State, or Price of Order]. Saint Petersburg: EUSP Press. 160 p. (In Russ.)

Yurchak A. 2014. Eto bylo navsegda, poka ne konchilos’. Poslednee sovetskoe pokolenie [Everything Was Forever Until It Was No More: The Last Soviet Generation]. Moscow: New Literary Observer. 664 p. (In Russ.)

Zemtsov A. 2019. “Strong Hand”: Authoritarianism in the Political Culture of Modern Russians. – Politeia. No. 4. P. 87-110. (In Russ.) https://www.doi.org/10.30570/2078-5089-2019-95-4-87-110  

Content No. 5, 2021

See also:


Melville A.Yu., Ilyin M.V., Meleshkina Ye.Yu., Mironyuk M.G., Sergeev V.M., Timofeev I.N.,
Political Atlas-2: World Crisis Megatrends. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No3

Batalov Ye.Ya.,
“New World Order”: To the Methodology of Analysis. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No5

Kupryashin G.L.,
Governing through institutional changes. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No6

Zakharov A.A.,
Federalism and the Globalization. – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No6

Martyanov V.S.,
Russian Political Regime in the Rent-estate Perspective. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No4

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
6 2007


Pantin I.K.
Unrealized Possibility

  Полный текст
 

Archive

   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991