Political innovations: obvious meanings and the nonobviousness of reality

Political innovations: obvious meanings and the nonobviousness of reality

Solovyov A.I.,

Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, solovyev@spa.msu.ru

elibrary_id: 75920 |

Article received: 2023.05.24. Accepted: 2023.06.08

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2023.05.08

For citation:

Solovyov A.I. Political innovations: obvious meanings and the nonobviousness of reality. – Polis. Political Studies. 2023. No. 5. P. 120-140. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2023.05.08. EDN: HMFLAW


Changes and the renewal of social orders and institutions always lead us to question the essence and nature of political innovations. However, the traditional interpretation of these changes as breakthrough transformations related to technological innovation and improvement of the human life environment does not always properly reflect their significance as tools for changing the basic parameters of the political system and the balance of political forces. These projects, being an exclusive product of political elites, contain all the advantages and costs of intra-elite competition, which is a trigger for significant changes in the field of politics and a tool for positioning each segment of the ruling stratum in the system of power. The weight and influence of political innovations supported by the status and informal segments of the ruling elite is most visible in the zone of state decision-making, the goals of which determine the nature of the distribution and redistribution of public goods and values. At the same time undeclared attitudes of elite groups and their information protection, combined with the active use of latent mechanisms of political design, do not allow society to adequately assess public actions, nor to realize the true intentions of those in power. The interinstitutional tensions and conflicts arising in the decision-making zone not only predetermine the clash of different approaches and ideas within elite groups, but are also reflected in contradictory signals sent to society, provoking in the mass consciousness disparate and sometimes unrealistic assessments and ideas about the processes underway in society. This type of promotion of innovative projects, causing cognitive shifts and crises of mass consciousness, ultimately affects the content of identification models of the population. First of all, this is reflected in the formation of a generalized image of the Fatherland among citizens, which is a single platform for society’s attitude to the proposed ideas and plans. The formation of a reliable system of general civil identification in accordance with public interests presupposes a special style of state activity, the maintenance by the authorities of an atmosphere of free search by citizens for their political solidarities, the promotion of intercultural communication and the maintenance of dialogical communications between the authorities and the population.

state, ruling elites, within elite groups, political innovations, political decision-making, models of political identification.


Benhabib, S. (1996). Toward a deliberative model of democratic legitimacy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political (pp. 67-94). Princeton. Princeton University Press.

Borchert, J., & Lessenich, S. (2016). Claus Offe and the critical theory of the capitalist state. London, New York: Routledge.

Bradley, R. (2018). Decision theory: a formal philosophical introduction. In S.O. Hansson, & V.F. Hendricks (Ed.), Introduction to Formal Philosophy (pp. 611-655). Cham: Springer International Publishing AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77434-3  

Bruder, J. (2019). Cognitive code: post-anthropocentric intelligence and the infrastructural brain. London: McGill-Queen´s University Press.

Chubarova, T., & Grigorieva, N. (2021). International knowledge transfer and Russian social policy: the case of gender mainstreaming. Global Social Policy, 21(1), 96-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018120969325

Cohen, L.J. (1982). Are people programmed to commit fallacies? Further thoughts about the interpretation of experimental data on probability judgment. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 12(3), 251-274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1982.tb00450.x

Croly, H. (1914). Progressive democracy. New York, NY: Macmillan.

Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (2007). Dialogues II. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who learns what from whom: a review of the policy transfer literature. Рolitical Studies, 44(2), 343-357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00334.x

Goldstone, J, Grinin, L., & Korotayev, A. (2022) The phenomenon and theories of revolution. In J.A. Goldstone, L. Grinin, & A. Korotayev (Ed.), Handbook of Revolutions in the 21st Century: The New Waves of Revolutions, and the Causes and Effects of Disruptive Political Change (Societies and Political Orders in Transition) (pp. 37-68). Springer International Publishing.

Hansson, S.O. (2005). Decision theory: a brief introduction. stockholm: department of philosophy and the history of technology. Royal Institute of Technology (KTH).

Heinrich, A. (2021). International knowledge transfer and learning in social policy: the case of the post-Soviet region. Global Social Policy, 21(1), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018121996077

Ibarra, P.R., & Kitsuse, J.I. (2003). Claims-making discourse and vernacular resources. In J.A. Holstein, G. Miller (Ed.). Challenges and Choices: Constructionist Perspectives on Social Problems (pp. 17-50). Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

John, P., & Cole, A. (2000). When do institutions, policy sectors, and cities matter? Comparing networks of local policy makers in Britain and France. Comparative Political Studies, 33(2), 248-268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414000033002004

Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Ed.) (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Khmelnitskaya, M. (2015). The policy-making process and social learning in Russia. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137409744

Ledeneva, A.V. (2013). Can Russia modernise? Sistema, power networks and informal governance. Cambrige, London: Cambrige University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511978494

Lewis, D. (1981). Causal decision theory. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 59(1), 5-30

Hurwitz, L. (1980). Political order: rewards, punishments and political stability, by U. Rosenthal. American Political Science Review, 74, 269-270. URL: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clpolsci_facpub/26

Savage, L.J. (1972). The foundations of statistics. New York, NY: Dover Publications.

Scruton, R. (1993). Oikophobia. The Journal of Education, 175(2), 98-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205749317500207

Chirkunov, O. (2012). Gosudarstvo i konkurentsiya. Stat'i [State and competition. Articles]. Moscow: New Literary Observer.

Elias, N. (2001). The society of individuals. (Russ. ed.: Elias, N. Obshchestvo individov. Moscow: Praxis).

Fathali, M.M. (2017). The psychology of dictatorship. (Russ. ed.: Fathali, M.M. Psikhologiya diktatury. Kharkov: Humanitarian Center).

Golubeva, A.A., & Sokolova, E.V. (2010). Innovation in the public sector: an introduction to the problem. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Management, 4, 28-57. (In Russ.)

Gordeev L. 2014. Innovations in modern policy: scientific understanding. Vestnik Universiteta, 16, 225-229. (In Russ.)

Graeber, D. (2016). The utopia of rules: on technology, stupidity, and the secret joys of bureaucracy. (Russ. ed.: Graeber, D. Utopiya pravil: o tekhnologiyakh, gluposti i tainom obayanii byurokratii. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press).

Hayoz, N. (2011). Governance, corruption and local structures of political power in Switzerland. In O.V. Gaman-Golutvina (Ed.) Ehlity i obshchestvo v sravnitel'nom izmerenii [Elites and society in a comparative dimension] (pp. 200-208). Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)

Ivanov, V.V. (2021). Gosudarstvennaya nauchno-tekhnicheskaya politika v usloviyakh global'nykh transformatsii [State science and technology policy in the context of global transformations]. In V.I. Yakunin, A.V. Torkunov, & M.G. Abramov (Ed.), Gosudarstvennaya politika v kontekste global'nykh vyzovov sovremennosti [State policy in the context of global challenges of our time] (pp. 141-161). Moscow: Moscow University Press. (In Russ.)

Jessop, B. (2019). The state: past, present, future. (Russ. ed.: Jessop, B. Gosudarstvo: proshloe, nastoyashchee i budushchee. Moscow: Delo RANEPA).

Kirsanova, E.G. (2012). Category of innovation in political science. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 12. Political sciences, 1, 15-24. (In Russ.)

Krasin, Yu.A. (Ed.). (2011). Innovatsionnaya modernizatsiya Rossii. Politologicheskie ocherki [Innovative modernization of Russia. Political essays]. Moscow: Institute of Sociology RAS. (In Russ.)

Kudina, M.V. (2023). Innovatsionnaya ehkonomika: teoriya i praktika [Innovative economics: theory and practice]. Moscow: Moscow University Press. (In Russ.)

Lapkin, V.V. (2012). Politicheskie izmeneniya v global'nom mire i dinamika identichnosti [Political change in a global world and identity dynamics]. In I.S. Semenenko, V.V. Lapkin, & V.I. Pantin (Ed.), Politicheskaya identichnost' i politika identichnosti [Political Identity and Identity Politics]. In two volumes. Vol. 2. (pp. 16-41). Moscow: ROSSPEN.  (In Russ.)

Lyagoshina, T.V. (2022). Hybridisation of public discourse in the modern media space: social effects and research prospects. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 69, 94-103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/69/11

Mascara, A.L. (2022). State and political form. (Russ. ed.: Mascara, A.L. Gosudarstvo i politicheskaya forma. Moscow: Gorizontal').

North, D. (1997). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. (Russ. ed.: North, D. Instituty, institutsional'nye izmeneniya i funktsionirovanie ehkonomiki. Moscow: Foundation of the economic book «Nachala»).

Orekhovsky P. (2009). Public authority and innovations (why innovation-based economy fails to be constructed in Russia). Society and Economy, 8-9, 93-116. (In Russ.)

Pollack, J., Sager, F., Sarcinelli, W., & Zimmer, A. (Ed.). (2012). Politik und Personlichkeit. (Russ. ed.: Pollack, J., Sager, F., Sarcinelli, W., & Zimmer, A. (Ed.). Politika i lichnost'. Kharkov: Humanitarian Center).

Popova, O.V., & Grishin, N.V. (2023). Political identity of Russian youth in self-assessments and experts’ assessments. Political Science (RU), 2, 140-162. (In Russ.) http://www.doi.org/10.31249/poln/2023.02.06

Rhodes, R.A.W. (2008). The new governance: governance without government. (Russ. ed.: Rhodes, R.A.W. Novyi metod upravleniya: upravlenie bez pravitel'stva. In N.Yu. Danilov, O.Yu. Gurov, & N.G. Zhidkov (Ed.), Publichnaya politika: ot teorii k praktike [Public Policy: from Theory to Practice] (pp. 51-72). Saint Petersburg: Aletheia.

Rogozhina, K.A. (2011). Patron-klientskie otnosheniya kak printsip vnutrennei konsolidatsii postsovetskikh ehlit [Patron-Client Relations as a Principle of Internal Consolidation of Post-Soviet Elites]. In O.V. Gaman-Golutvina (Ed.), Ehlity i obshchestvo v sravnitel'nom izmerenii [Elites and society in a comparative dimension] (pp. 374-389). Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)

Sabatier, P.A., & Jenkins-Smith, H.C. (2008). The advocacy coalition framework: an assessment. (Russ. ed.: Sabatier, P.A., & Jenkins-Smith, H.C. Kontseptsiya lobbi-koalitsii: otsenka. In N.Yu. Danilov, O.Yu. Gurov, & N.G. Zhidkov (Ed.), Publichnaya politika: ot teorii k praktike [Public Policy: from Theory to Practice] (pp. 94-154). Saint Petersburg: Aletheia.

Schumpeter, J. (1995). Schöpferische Zerstörung. (Russ. ed.: Schumpeter, J. Protsess «sozidatel'nogo razrusheniya». In Schumpeter, J. Teoriya ehkonomicheskogo razvitiya. Kapitalizm, sotsializm i demokratiya (pp. 459-463). Moscow: Economizdat).

Schütz, A. (2004). Izbrannoe: mir, svetyashchiisya smyslom [Selected works: a world luminous with meaning]. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)

Sergeev, V.M. (2008). Innovation as a political problem. Politeia, 1, 114-125. (In Russ.)

Spengler, O. (1998). Decline of the West. Vol. 2: Perspectives of world history. (Russ. ed.: Spengler, O. Ocherki morfologii mirovoi istorii. Vol. 2. Vsemirno-istoricheskie perspektivy. Moscow: Mysl').

Titov, V.V. (2023). Transformation of national-state identity in modern Russia. Abstract of the dissertation for the academic degree of Doctor of Political Sciences. Moscow: Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation. (In Russ.)

Voegelin, E. (2021). The new science of politics. An introduction. (Russ. ed.: Voegelin, E. Novaya nauka politiki. Vvedenie. Saint Petersburg: Vladimir Dal').

Zaostrovzev, A. (2020). Polemika o modernizatsii: obshchaya doroga ili osobye puti? [The controversy of modernization: a common road or special paths?]. Saint Petersburg: EUSP Press. (In Russ.)

Zavershinskiy, K.F. (2018). Symbolic dimensions of the socio-cultural dynamics of contemporary political elites. Power and Elites, 5, 438-460. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31119/pe.2018.5.16 

Content No. 5, 2023

See also:

Solovyov A.I.,
Power and Politics. Polemic Notes about “Damned Questions” of Political Science. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No6

Alekseyeva T.A., Loshkariov I.D., Parenkov D.A.,
Dilemmas of the Modern Theory of Political Elites: What’s Next?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No5

Peregudov S.P.,
Parties and interest groups: to a new model of interaction. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No1

Kosov Yu.V., Vovenda A.V.,
DEMOCRACY IN THE SERVICE OF ELITES. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No4

Smorgunov L.V., Pavroz A.V.,
Political Decision Making: Theory and Methodology. – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No4

Screen version