Agents and mechanisms of political domination, or how a “winning coalition” rules

Agents and mechanisms of political domination, or how a “winning coalition” rules


Solovyov A.I.,

Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, solovyev@spa.msu.ru


elibrary_id: 75920 |

Article received: 2023.12.21. Accepted: 2024.01.10


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2024.02.08
EDN: CGFBMG


For citation:

Solovyov A.I. Agents and mechanisms of political domination, or how a “winning coalition” rules . – Polis. Political Studies. 2024. No. 2. P. 96-117. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.02.08. EDN: CGFBMG



Abstract

Considering the relationship between state and society as the main area of thematic division of power “over” and “for”, the author shows the grounds that reveal that political domination is a certain form and stage of the historical evolution of political power, reflecting (in contrast to the democratic version of its development) the gradual usurpation by the ruling circles of their institutional (general civil) powers, truncation of citizens' rights and reduction of opportunities for their participation in government decision-making. In this context, the author, considering internal elite conflicts as the main source of such an evolution of power relations, draws attention to the so-called “winning” coalition of the ruling class, which concentrated in its hands the main instruments of control over government decision-making and the distribution of key public goods and resources. At the same time, a complex set of functions and tasks for developing public policy goals, identifying privileged groups and maintaining social stability predetermines the identification of internal groupings of this elite stratum, allowing it to manage and construct social relations in accordance with the stated political course and its hidden intentions. In this context, the article identifies seven main segments of this ruling group, performing various tasks in the field of competition with rival groups of the ruling class and in the field of relations with society and structures of the civil sector. In this regard, the corresponding contradictions between individual segments of the “winning” coalition are identified, as well as the technologies and mechanisms characteristic of these elite groups that contribute to the fulfillment of their role and support the format of political dominance.

Keywords
power, domination, politics, state, ruling elites, intra-elite conflicts, mechanisms of government of a winning coalition.


References

Allison, G.T. (1968). Conceptual models and the Cuban missile crisis: rational policy, organization process, and bureaucratic politics. Santa Monica: Harvard University Press; Rand Corporation.

Collins, R. (2011). Explaining the anti-Soviet revolution by state breakdown theory and geopolitical theory. International Politics, 48(4), 575-590. https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2011.15

Druckman, J.N. (2008). Dynamic approaches to studying parliamentary coalitions. Political Research Quarterly, 61(3), 479-483. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912908321745

Goldstone, J.A. (2016). Revolution and rebellion in the early modern world: population change and state breakdown in England, France, Turkey, and China,1600-1850; 25th Anniversary Edition. London; New York: Routledge.

Goldstone, J.A., Grinin, L., & Korotayev, A. (2022). The phenomenon and theories of revolution. In J.A. Goldstone, L. Grinin, & A. Korotayev (Ed.), Handbook of Revolutions in the 21st Century. The New Waves of Revolutions, and the Causes and Effects of Disruptive Political Change (pp. 37-68). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86468-2_2

Haugaard, M. (2010). Power: a ‘family resemblance' concept. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 13(4), 419-438. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549410377152

Heritier, A., & Eckert, S. (2008). New modes of governance in the shadow of hierarchy: self-regulation by industry in Europe. Journal of Public Policy, 21(1), 113-138. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X08000809

Higley, J. (2018). Continuities and discontinuities in elite theory. In I. Best, & J. I igley (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Political Elites (pp. 25-39). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51904-7_4

Hoffmann-Lange, U. (2018). Theory-based typologies of political elites. In I. Best, & J. I igley (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Political Elites (pp. 53-68). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hoffmann-Lange, U. (2020). Elites. In The SAGE Handbook of Political Science (pp. 499-514). Los Angeles: Sage.

Ibarra, P.R., & Kitsuse, J.I. (2003). Claims-making discourse and vernacular resources. In G. Miller, & J.A. I olstein (Ed.), Challenges and Choices: Constructionist Perspectives on Social Problems (pp. 17-50). Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter.

Keller, S. (1963). Beyond the Ruling Class: Strategic Elites in Modern Society. N.Y. Random Iouse.

Khan, S.R. (2012). Sociology of elites. Annual Review of Sociology, 38(1), 361-377. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071811-145542

Koselleck, R. (1988). Critique and crisis: enlightenment and the pathogenesis of modern society. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, Berg Publishers Ltd.

Mazzucato, M. (2021). Mission economy: a moonshot guide to changing capitalism. London: Allen Lane- Penguin.

Oppenheimer, F. (2017). The state: its history and development viewed sociologically. Auckland: The Floating Press.

Riker, W.I. (1962). The theory of political coalitions. New Iaven, London: Yale University Press.

Scott, J.C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Iaven, London: Yale University Press.

Strom, K., Muller, W., & Bergman, T. (Ed.). (2008). Cabinets and coalition bargaining: the democratic life cycle in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Turchin, P. (2013). Modeling social pressures toward political instability. Cliodynamics The Journal of Theoretical and Mathematical History, 4(2), 241-280. https://doi.org/10.21237/C7clio4221333

 

Alekseenkova, Ye.S., & Sergeev, V.M. (2008). The dark well of power (on the boundary between the private sphere of the state and the persons private sphere). Polis. Political Studies, 3, 148-165. (In Russ.)

Arendt, I. (2014). On violence. (Russ. ed.: Arendt, I. O nasilii. Moscow: Novoe izdatelstvo.)

Bredemejer, K. (2021). Schwarze Rhetorik: Macht und Magie der Sprache. Mit zahlreichen Ubungen.

(Russ. ed.: Bredemejer, K. Chernaya ritorika. Vlast' i magiya slova. Moscow: Al'pina Pablisher).

Duka, A. (2021). Mobility and endogeneity of regional political and administrative elites. Power and Elites, 8(1), 66-99. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31119/pe.2021.8.1.3

Duka, A. (2022). Elites in a crisis society. Power and Elites, 9 (1), 5-36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31119/pe.2022.9.1.1.

Elias, N. (2001). The society of individuals. (Russ. ed.: Elias, N. Obshchestvo individov. Moscow: Praxis.)

Golosov, G. (2019). Avtokratiya, ili Odinochestvo vlasti [Autocracy, or the solitude of power]. St. Petersburg: EUSP Press. (In Russ.)

Graeber, D.R. (2016). The utopia ofrules. On technology, stupidity, and the secretjoys ofbureacracy. (Russ. ed.: Graeber, D.R. Utopiya pravil. O tekhnologiyakh, gluposti i tainom obayanii byurokratii. Moscow: Ad Marginem).

Greif, A. (2013). Institutions and the part to the modern economy. Lessons from Medieval trade. (Russ. ed.: Greif, A. Instituty i put' k sovremennoi ehkonomike. Uroki srednevekovoi torgovli. Moscow: ISE University Publishing Iouse).

Janda, K., Berri, J.M., Goldman, J., & Iula, K.W. (2006). The challenge of democracy. (Russ. ed.: Janda, K., Berri, J.M., Goldman, J., Iula, K.W. Trudnym putem demokratii: protsess gosudarstvennogo upravleniya v USA. Moscow: ROSSPEN).

Jessop, B. (2019). The state. Past, present, future. (Russ. ed.: Jessop, B. Gosudarstvo: proshloe, nas- toyashchee i budushchee. Moscow: DELO RANEPA Publishing house).

Kharkhordin, O.V. (2021). Respublika. Polnaya versiya [Republic. Full version]. St. Petersburg: EUSP Press.

Latypov, R.F., & Timasheva, C.T. (2016). The rotation cycles of the ruling elite as a factor of crisises of Russia's political system. The Authority, 24(12), 73-78. (In Russ.)

Lachmann, R. (2010). Capitalists in spite of themselves: elite conflict and economic transitions in early Modern Europe. (Russ. ed.: Lachmann, R. Kapitalisty ponevole. Konflikt ehlit i ehkonomicheskie preobra- zovaniya v Evrope rannego Novogo vremeni. Moscow: Territoriya budushchego).

Ledyaev, V.G. (2012). Sotsiologiya vlasti. Teoriya i opyt ehmpiricheskogo issledovaniya vlasti v gorodski- kh soobshchestvakh [Sociology of power. Theory and experience of empirical research of power in urban communities]. Moscow: HSE University Publishing House. (In Russ.)

Mann, M. (2014). Vlast' v XXI stoletii. Besedy s John A. Hall [Power in the 21st Century. Conversations with John A. Hall (“table-talks”)]. Moscow: HSE University Publishing House. (In Russ.)

Morozova, O.S., & Rudas', T.P. (2023). The potential of informal political institutions in stabilizing political relations in West Africa. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 76, 240-248. (In Russ.)

North, D. (1997). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. (Russ. ed.: North, D. Instituty, institutsional'nye izmeneniya i funktsionirovanie ehkonomiki. Moscow: NACHALA.)

Ostrom, E. (2011). Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. (Russ. ed.: Ostrom, E. Upravlyaya obshhim. E'volyuciya institutov kollektivnoj deyatel'nosti. Moscow: IRISEN, Mysl Publishing.)

Patrushev, S.V., & Filippova L.E. (Ed.). (2019). Gospodstvo protiv politiki: rossiiskii sluchai. Effektivnost' institutsional'noi struktury i potentsial strategii politicheskikh izmenenii [Domination against politics: the Russian case. The effectiveness of the institutional structure and the potential of strategies for political change]. Moscow: Political Encyclopedia. (In Russ.)

Rastorguev, S.V. (2022). Resource-actor analysis in political studies. Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University, 12(2), 45-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2022-12-2-45-52

Rakhmanov A.B. (2023). Mauser rifles, Maxim machine guns, Krupp cannons, communication connectivity and Max Weber's theory of legitimate domination. Part two. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 75, 230-239. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/75/19

Rozov, N.S. (2019). Filosofiya i teoriya istorii. Book 2: Prichiny, dinamika i smysl revolyutsii [Philosophy and theory of history. Book 2: Causes, dynamics and meaning of revolutions]. Moscow: Ehditorial URSS. (In Russ.)

Rubinshtein, A.Ya. (Ed.). (2023). Gumanitarnyi sektor paternalistskogo gosudarstva [Humanitarian sector of the paternalistic state]. St. Petersburg: Aletheia.

Shanin, T. (2012). On James Scott's ethnographic sociology. Sociology of Power, 4-5, 9-16. (In Russ.)

Shul'ga, N.A. (2011). Dreif na obochinu: dvadtsat' let obshchestvennykh izmenenii v Ukraine [Drifting to the margins: twenty years of social change in Ukraine]. Kyiv: Drukarnya “Biznespoligraf”.

Schmitt, С. (2000). PolitiscHe THeologie Vier Kapiltel Zur Lehre Von Der Souveranitat. Romischer Katholizismus Und PolitischHe Form. Die Geistesgeschichtliche Lage Des Heutigen (Russ. ed.: Schmitt, С. Politicheskaya teologiya. Moscow. Kanon-Press-C; Kuchkovo Pole Publishing.)

Sidorov, V.V. (2014). Theories of party coalition formation in foreign political science. Political Science (RU), 1, 211-222. (In Russ.)

Smirnov, V.A. (2017). Politicheskie ehlity v malykh stranakh: voprosy teorii [Political elites in small countries: theoretical issues]. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)

Soloviev A.I. (2021a). Politika i upravlenie gosudarstvom. Ocherki teorii i metodologii [Politics and government. Essays on theory and methodology]. Moscow: Aspect Press. (In Russ.)

Soloviev, A.I. (2021b). “Evidence-based Policy” and “Policy of Evidence”: The Dilemma of Post-Soviet Societies. Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, 14(5), 60-81. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2021-14-5-3

Volkov, V. (2018; 2022). Gosudarstvo, ili tsena poryadka [State. The price of order]. St. Petersburg: EUSP Press. (In Russ.)

Weber, M. (2019). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. (Russ. ed.: Weber, M. Khozyaistvo i obshchestvo: ocherki ponimayushchei sotsiologii, in 4 vol. Vol. IV. Gospodstvo. Moscow: HSE University Publishing House.)

Content No. 2, 2024

See also:


Solovyov A.I.,
Power and Politics. Polemic Notes about “Damned Questions” of Political Science. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No6

Kochetkov A.P.,
Authority and elites in a global information society. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No5

Yermolin I.V.,
Advocacy coalitions and resource dependency theory. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No1

Zaznaev O.I.,
Ethnic Conflict and Forms of Government: Contemporary Discussions. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No1

Nedyak I.L.,
The conceptualization of power in the contemporary scientific discourse of domination. – Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No1

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
1 2007


Kertman G.L.
The Status of a Party in Russian Political Culture

 The article text
 

Archive

   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991