The Power and Society in the Field of Elections, or Zero-Sum Games

The Power and Society in the Field of Elections, or Zero-Sum Games

Pastukhov V.B.,

Dr. Sci. (Pol. Sci.), Prof., St. Antony’s College, Oxford,


For citation:

Pastukhov V.B. The Power and Society in the Field of Elections, or Zero-Sum Games . – Polis. Political Studies. 1999. No. 5. P. 6. (In Russ.)

A long time is yet to pass before elections become an institution of democratic change of power in Russia, the author of the article, D.Sc.(Politics), maintains. Political power in the country is self-sufficient and is able to reproduce itself without civil society’s participation. The power’s self-sufficience results from the lack of economic and legal base of federalism, from the lack of actual division of powers, and from legal nihilism. The freedom in Russia, and democratic freedom, have little in common, just as glasnost and openness have little in common. Russian society is debarred from participation in actions of Russian power, it is helpless, for it lacks corporative consciousness and has no mechanism at its disposal, of realising corporative interests, and therefore depends entirely on the state. The «gubernization» of Russia is a tentative to create a new power-generating nucleus. The regions are today almost autonomous authoritarian enclaves. The «gubernization is the political form of existence of regional consciousness. Governors’ coalitions are growing in Russia into the most efficient political force. The author also describes the «nuances» of the functioning of Russian capital and of Russian mass-media. The present conflict of the power and society in Russia is the final phase of development of the inner conflict within the Russian power itself. Whatever the result of the parliamentary and of the presidential elections, it will be the choice of the power, not of society. These elections will not become a milestone in Russia’s history, the author holds.

Content No. 5, 1999

See also:

Tishkov V.A.,
Nationality: Communist? (Ethno-Political Analysis of the CPSU). – Polis. Political Studies. 1991. No2

Moiseyev N.N.,
Is It Possible Today to Outline the Future?. – Polis. Political Studies. 1991. No3

Gorbachev M.S.,
To the Decennium of Perestroika: Foreign Policy, 1985-1995. – Polis. Political Studies. 1995. No3

Busygina I.M.,
Post-Modernism in Moscow .. – Polis. Political Studies. 1995. No6

Levin I.B.,
The Fate and the Lessons of the Historic Compromise. – Polis. Political Studies. 1991. No3



   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991