Defining the Basic Notions of the Elites Theory

Defining the Basic Notions of the Elites Theory


Gaman-Golutvina O.V.,

Dr. Sci. (Polit. Sci.), Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Head of the Comparative Political Science Department, MGIMO University; President of the Russian Association of Political Science; Professor, National Research University Higher School of Economics; Editor-in-Chief of the journal “Comparative Politics”; member of the Public Chamber of the Russian Federation and the Public Council under the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia, ogaman@mgimo.ru


elibrary_id: 250180 | ORCID: 0000-0002-2660-481X | RESEARCHER_ID: E-4046-2012

Rubric: Chair

For citation:

Gaman-Golutvina O.V. Defining the Basic Notions of the Elites Theory . – Polis. Political Studies. 2000. No. 3



Abstract
Elitology is an enormously popular, if relatively new domain of political science in Russia. One of the leading Russian specialists active in this sphere of research has, in the present article, set herself the task to examine and analyze the apparatus terminologicus of this discipline. There’s just one thing specialists nowadays agree about: they presume it is a contingent of persons singled out as minions of fortune that should be called elite. But elitologists differ in opinion as to what should be considered criterion of this status of being marked off by fortune as elite: nobleness of origin, wealth, or natural endowments. A challenging problem thus facing elitology consists, in paricular, in the need to investigate the ways and channels through which a certain position in achieved within a social group, or (to put it more specifically) to clear up the mechanisms of persons’ being selected for the elite, of the so-called elite recruitment. The author points to dissimilarity of elite recruitment in different countries, including different countries within the Western world.

Content No. 3, 2000

See also:


Lvova E.L., Nam I.V., Naumova N.I.,
National- Personal Autonomy: the Idea and the Embodiment. – Polis. Political Studies. 1993. No2

Gelbras V.G.,
China in Russia's Oriental Policy (Opinions and Conceptions of Scientists and Politicans) (I). – Polis. Political Studies. 1997. No4

Vorobyov D.M.,
Development of Political Science Community in Post-Soviet Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No6

Round Table of the «Polis» Journal, Vorozheykina T.Ye., Degtyarev Andrey Alekseevich, Kapustin B.G., Polyakov L.V.,
On a Reform in Teaching Political Sciences within the Higher-Educational System of Russian Federation. – Polis. Political Studies. 2001. No1

Pshizova S.N.,
What Party System Will Our Society Accept?. – Polis. Political Studies. 1998. No4

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
2 2002


Yanitsky O.N.
Ecological Politics as a Network Process

 The article text (электронная версия)
 

Archive

   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991