To Know or to Call: Metaphor as Cognitive Resource of Social Knowledge

To Know or to Call:
Metaphor as Cognitive Resource of Social Knowledge

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2004.02.10

For citation:

Pecherskaya N.V. To Know or to Call: Metaphor as Cognitive Resource of Social Knowledge . – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No. 2. P. 93-105. (In Russ.).


An attempt has been made in the article to analyze social discourse in the light of the metaphor interpreted not just as a means of description, but as a mode of generating social knowledge. The subject discussed is not the metaphor per se, but the metaphor as alternative logic of producing social knowledge, as cognitive resource which, on the one hand, determines and cements scientific paradigms, and, on the other, establishes the vector of innovations in man’s knowledge of himself and of the surrounding world. Proceeding from the ideas suggested by the initiators of the “linguistic turn” in social sciences, the author demonstrates that the metaphor is a mode of constructing meanings that are lacking in the language: destroying habitual ideas of reality, it makes us look anew and otherwise at the interrelation between elements, inscribe our understanding into a new frame of perception. With this, furthermore, the metaphor, as the author notes, not only actualizes, but also generates sense. In a metaphoric utterance there emerges new content not reducible to the one generally accepted.

Content No. 2, 2004

See also:

Zavershinsky K.F.,
Methodological Complementarity in the Research of Symbolic Moulds of Political Institutions' Dynamics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No1

Petrov K.E.,
Structure of the “Terrorism” Concept 130. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No4

Chernikov M.V.,
Logic of Social Interactions in the Light of Two Conditions of Justice. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No5

Sergeyev K.V.,
“Peripheral Knowledge” in the Creativity Discourse: Social Nets of the Interesting. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No1

Sergeyev K.V.,
Cognitive Models and the Formation of Religious Institutions: the Ancient Protognosticism. – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No5



   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991