Lessons of Ukrainian

Lessons of Ukrainian

Gelman V.Ya.,

Cand. Sci. (Pol. Sci.), Prof., Faculty of Political Sciences and Sociology, European University at St. Petersburg. St. Petersburg, Russia, gelman@eu.spb.ru

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2005.01.04

For citation:

Gelman V.Ya. Lessons of Ukrainian . – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No. 1. P. 36-49. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2005.01.04


In the article, an attempt has been made to look upon the developments of December, 2004 in Ukraine in the light of the political regimes transformation model elaborated by the author with the use of the material of comparative study of Russian regions. On considering “prehistory of the matter” (development of the country’s political institutions and political elites) and on analyzing the dynamics of the conflicts and alliances of the principal political actors at the elections of 2004, the author advances the supposition that Ukraine has embarked on the path that has since 1989 been followed by the countries of Eastern Europe. A conflict that threatened to grow into “war of all against all”, resulted in the withdrawal from a situation of indefiniteness after a model of “struggle according to the rules”, which created, even if not democracy in Ukraine, yet a “democratic situation” favourable for its formation. In the author’s estimate, the trend of the institutional innovations adopted in the course of the conflict (amplification of the parliament’s powers, curtailment of the president of his power, transition to proportional electoral system, and decentralization) is such, that, given certain conditions, they may rule out the probability of the power being monopolized after the “winner takes all” principle.

Content No. 1, 2005

See also:

Peregudov S.P.,
Transnational Corporations on the Way to Corporate Citizenship. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No3

Fyodorov K.G.,
The Policy in the Sphere of Local Taxation in Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No4

Peregudov S.P.,
Corporate Capital and Power Institutions: Who Plays the Master?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2002. No5

Kazantzev A.A.,
Intelligentsia and Structural Innovations in Political Expanse (An Essay of Comparative Analysis). – Polis. Political Studies. 2007. No1

Sergeev V.M.,
How Are Social Changes Possible? (Prolegomena to a Statistical Theory of Social Networks). – Polis. Political Studies. 2001. No6



Introducing an article

Polis. Political Studies
6 2004

Koss M.
Inter-Party Competition and Federalism in Germany

 The article text


   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991