«New» or «Old» great debates?

«New» or «Old» great debates?



Rubric: Feedback

For citation:

Safronova O.V., Korshunov D.S. «New» or «Old» great debates? – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No. 4



Abstract

By this response on the part of our collegues from two universities of Nizhni Novgorod, the Polis journal opens discussion on topical trends in today’s realm of international relations theory (IRT). Strictly speaking, the discussion in question was already actually initiated exactly by V. Konyshev and A. Sergunin in their article in Polis, 2013, No. 2.

Keywords
international relations theory (IRT); “great debates”; V. Konyshev; A. Sergunin.


Content No. 4, 2013

See also:


Alekseyeva T.A.,
The Debates about “Great Debates”: How to Structure the Theory of International Relations. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No6

Konyshev V.N., Sergunin A.A.,
“The Great Debates”: The Means of Structuring or Periodization of International Relations Theory?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No4

Konyshev V.N., Sergunin A.A.,
International relations theory: on the threshold of new «Great Debates»?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No2

Pavlova E.B., Romanova T.A.,
Debates in International Relations Theory: Rethinking Interdisciplinarity. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No2

Sergeev V.M., Kazantzev A.A., Medvedeva S.M.,
The Crisis of Constructivism and Methodological Problems of Studying International Relations. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No5

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
3 2006


Roshchin Ye.N.
Quentin Skinner’s History of Notions

 The article text
 

Archive

   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991