The legitimacy of postrevolutionary power: principles and criteria

The legitimacy of postrevolutionary power:
principles and criteria


Rozov N.S.,

Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Professor, Principal Researcher, Institute of Philosophy and Law, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences; Professor at the Department of International Relations and Regional Studies, Novosibirsk State Technical University, Novosibirsk, Russia , nrozov@gmail.com


elibrary_id: 72298 | ORCID: 0000-0003-2362-541X | RESEARCHER_ID: K-5447-2017


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2014.05.07

For citation:

Rozov N.S. The legitimacy of postrevolutionary power: principles and criteria. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No. 5. P. 90-107. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2014.05.07



Abstract

Social political crises and revolutions become more frequent in the new period of global turbulence. All revolutionary powers and regimes sooner or late meet the problem of legitimacy. The classical Weber’s division of legitimacy is insufficient, and a new typology of legitimacy is suggested on the basis of evaluating agent (the popular legitimacy, the legitimacy of coercive force, the authoritative legitimacy, the international legitimacy) and on the legal basis (the legitimacy de facto and de jure, the last one includes formal legality and general legal legitimacy). The principles and criteria of revolutionary legitimacy are presented and discussed: relation to illegitimate repressive laws, conditions for the transition to armed resistance, the problem of provocations, conflict resolution between revolutionary center and a counterrevolutionary province (“Vandea”). It is shown how the fundamental legal principles and values of general significance (basic humanistic values) are used for legitimating of revolution in situation of formal legacy deficiency.

Keywords
legitimacy; revolution; revolutionary legitimacy; peaceful protests; armed insurrection; rebellion; the revolutionary power; the authoritarian regime; values of general significance.


Content No. 5, 2014

See also:


Rozov N.S.,
Crisis and Revolutions: Fields of Interaction, Actors’ Strategies, and Trajectories of Conflict Dynamics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No6

Pivovarov Yu.S.,
«...And the age in a mess». – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No6

Extraction.,
Legitimacy. – Polis. Political Studies. 1993. No5

Ryabov A.V.,
Legality and Legitimacy of Power. – Polis. Political Studies. 1994. No2

Shpakova R.P.,
Legitimacy and Democracy (Max Weber's Lessons). – Polis. Political Studies. 1994. No2

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
3 2002


Eisenstadt S.N.
The Paradox of Democratic Regimes: Fragility and Transformability (II).

 The article text (Электронная версия)
 

Archive

   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991