Election or coronation? The scope of presidential powers in the countries of the third wave of democratization

Election or coronation? The scope of presidential powers in the countries of the third wave of democratization

Lokshin I.M.,

Junior Researcher at the Laboratory of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods of Analysis of Political Regimes, National Research University Higher School of Economics; Lecturer at the Department of Political Science, National Research University Higher School of Economics, ilya.lokshin.ne@inbox.ru

elibrary_id: 809751 |

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2014.05.09

For citation:

Lokshin I.M. Election or coronation? The scope of presidential powers in the countries of the third wave of democratization – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No. 5. P. 118-138. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2014.05.09


The paper identifies the factors influencing the scope of presidential powers. To test the hypotheses via simple OLS regressions, a new Index of presidential powers has been developed which evaluates presidential powers in comparison with parliamentary powers. The Index is based on the approach of M. Shugart and J. Carey but their way to measure presidential powers was modified in order to be more in line with the aims of the paper. The predictors are: a) the political uncertainty in the period of constitution-drafting process; b) the comparative strength of actors participating in the constitution-drafting; c) index of democracy; d) the breach with the authoritarian past; e) geographic location; f) ethnic fragmentation. The sample consists of countries where a new constitution was adopted after 1970. The results are robust to alternative versions of both independent and dependent variables and to the exception of the most influential observations. The results show that contextual factors (geographic location) are much more significant than factors which imply universal causal mechanisms. The paper indicates that contextual explanations of the scope of presidential powers either can be proposed instead of explanations based on universal causal mechanisms, or they can be used along with the latter and deepen them. The most important limitations of the paper are: small sample size (N = 44) and subjectivity associated with the development of the coding rules which lie behind the Index of presidential powers. As far as the latter is concerned, there is the free access to coding rules via the internet-link in the paper.

constitution; presidential powers; president; parliament; power; democratization.

Content No. 5, 2014

See also:

Putintsev I.S.,
The evolution of the presidential role in Poland’s political system since 1989. – Polis. Political Studies. 2023. No2

Rivera D.W., Rivera Sh.V.,
Yeltsin, Putin and the power of the president. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No3

Feldman M.A.,
Concerning “the ability of socialist rhetoric to structure a new social reality”. – Polis. Political Studies. 2023. No1

Pomiguev I.A.,
The Council of the State Duma: Real Veto Player or a Technical Executive?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No2

Kovler A.I.,
Constitution Formal and Real. – Polis. Political Studies. 1998. No6



Introducing an article

Polis. Political Studies
6 2002

Kovalev V.A.
Post-Authoritarian Syndrome in a Region (Experience of Komi Republic in the Context of the “Putin Federalism”)

(электронная версия)


   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991