Risks of Energy Security: the Need For Humanistic Geopolitics

Risks of Energy Security:
the Need For Humanistic Geopolitics

Kravchenko S.A.,

Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Professor, Department of Sociology, MGIMO University; Principal Researcher, Institute of Sociology of FCTAS RAS, Moscow, Russia , sociol7@yandex.ru

elibrary_id: 77019 | RESEARCHER_ID: H-5769-2016


Dr. Sci. (Tech.), corresponding member of RAS, Professor, Moscow State University of International Relations, MFA Russia

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2015.05.06

For citation:

Kravchenko S.A., Risks of Energy Security: the Need For Humanistic Geopolitics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2015. No. 5. P. 64-74. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2015.05.06


The article analyzes the risks of energy security in the context of functioning of a modern main oil pipeline being a complex type of network transport the intensive development of which was claimed by the realities of globalization and the increasingly complex social and cultural dynamics. It is proved that the neo-liberal geopolitics because of its basic principles – freedom of enterprise, formal rationalism, pragmatism and mercantilism – not only failed to solve the problems of the declared equal access for residents of Europe and the world to energy resources, but also gave birth to man-made risks of local conflicts around the construction and functioning of pipelines with their trend to become globalized. According to the authors, the management of the arising risks and minimization of their negative consequences lies in the ways of the humanistic script of the development of the partnership among countries and peoples and the harmonization of relations of socium with nature. The concrete specific driver of this process would be to move from the neo-liberal geopolitics to the humanist geopolitics the consolidated the goals of which are the search and establishment of new forms of humanism concerning human existential needs including the achievement of the indivisible energy security.

risks; energy security; mainline of oil transportation; neoliberal geopolitics; humanistic geopolitics.

Content No. 5, 2015

See also:

Isayev B.A.,
Geopolitics: classical and modern. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No2

Tzymbursky V.L.,
Speak, memory!. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No2

Kravchenko S.A.,
New risks of food: the need for a humanistic biopolitics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No5

Tzymbursky V.L.,
Geopolitics as a Mode of Vision of the World and an Occupation. – Polis. Political Studies. 1999. No4

Sorokin K.E.,
Geopolitics of the Contemporary World and Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 1995. No1



   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991