The Council of the State Duma: Real Veto Player or a Technical Executive?

The Council of the State Duma:
Real Veto Player or a Technical Executive?


Pomiguev I.A.,

HSE University. Moscow, Russia; Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Moscow, Russia; Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation. Moscow, Russia, pomilya@mail.ru


elibrary_id: 747133 | ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3068-5664 | RESEARCHER_ID: K-6308-2018


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2016.02.12
Rubric: Russia Today

For citation:

Pomiguev I.A. The Council of the State Duma: Real Veto Player or a Technical Executive? – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No. 2. P. 171-183. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2016.02.12



Abstract

The implications of the Crimea becoming part of the Russian Federation are multifaceted; first of all, they can be seen in the political sphere. In order to legitimize the accession process, the powers of most political actors were mobilized, especially the ones of the institutional and partisan veto players, whose agreement is necessary for a change of the legislative status quo. Necessity to respond rapidly to the Crimean event was the cause of the emergence of political functions of the Council of the State Duma – the internal institutional structure, which used to be responsible only for organizational work of the lower house of the parliament. The subsequent formal confirmation of such functions is the reason to assume that Russia has a new veto-player. To understand the actual role of the Council of the State Duma in the legislative process, the author has analyzed its powers and considered qualitative and quantitative indicators which influence the agenda and legislative initiatives. The results show that the Council of the State Duma is a strong technical structure characterized by political composition and limited political opportunities.

Keywords
veto players; legislative process; legislative status quo; parliament; political institutions; political parties; the Council of State Duma; agenda setting.


Content No. 2, 2016

See also:


Pomiguev I.A., Alekseev D.V.,
Resetting Bills: Discontinuity as a Political Technology for Blocking Policy Decision. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No4

Tartzan V.N.,
The state youth policy in contemporary Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No3

Gelman V.Ya.,
Political Parties in Russia: from Competition – to Hierarchy. – Polis. Political Studies. 2008. No5

Shevchenko Yu.D.,
Institutionalization of the State Duma and the Third Convocation Deputies’ Participation in the 2003 Parliamentary Elections. – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No1

Suvakovic U.,
Political parties as traditional mechanisms of representation in modern societies. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No2

 
 

Archive

   2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991