Conservatives About Conservatives

Conservatives About Conservatives

Makarenko B.I.,

Chairman of the Board of Directors, Center of Political Technologies, professor, National Research University – Higher School of Economics,

elibrary_id: 251052 | ORCID: 0000-0002-0136-8785 | RESEARCHER_ID: L-3134-2015

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2017.01.16

For citation:

Makarenko B.I. Conservatives About Conservatives. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No. 1. P. 183-191. (In Russ.).


In this critical review of the issue of the almanac Essays on Conservatism (Institute of Socio-economic and Political Research, ISEPR), which offers a deep insight in the contemporary history of conservatism, the author analyzes the current state of conservatism as a political movement in the United States on the basis of the Essays devoted to this subject, and of the recent presidential elections in the USA. The author proceeds from the fact that, existing in a competitive political environment, conservatism faces challenges of a changing public demand for policies, due to both the socio-economic situation and changing demographic composition of the population. The author shows how radicalism increased in response to frustration of the society and analyzes the roots of the radical and powerful demand for right populism in the United States in general. For decades, democratic political regimes provided stability both in politics and economics: population of these counties profited from integration, globalization, “open economy”: therefore, dominant position of establishment – the political “center”, left- and center-right parties was accepted without doubt. However, the last decades changed this trend. American conservatism, on the one hand, found a new base of support that helped Republican candidates win in the elections; on the other hand, conservatism deepened the divisions and contradictions in American society, and thus came into a conflict with a number of other traditional settings of conservatism. The author concludes that after the presidential elections of 2016, American conservatism faces serious top-down redefinition. 

USA; political parties; conservatism; Donald Trump; elections; ISEPR; Boris Mezhuev.


Crozier M., Huntington S. Crisis of Democracy: Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission. New York: New York University Press. 1976.160 p.

Huntington S. Who Are We? The Challenges to America’s National Identity. New York: Simon and Schuster. 2004. 448 p.

Martilenelli A. Conclusions. Policy Implications for the EU. – Populism on the Rise: Democracies under Challenge? Ed by A. Martinelli. Milano: Edizione Epoke – ISPI. 2016. 121 p.

Mead W. Special Providence: American Foreign Policy and How It Changed the World. New York: Routledge. 2002. 400 p.

Konservatizm i razvitiye: Osnovy obshchestvennogo soglasiya. Pod red. B.I. Makarenko [Conservatism and Development. Foundations of Public Consensus. Ed. by B.I. Makarenko]. Moscow: Al’pina Publisher. 2015. 332 p.

Tetradi po konservatizmu. Al’manakh Fonda ISEPI [Essays on Conservatism]. No. 1. Moscow: Institute of Socio-economic and Political Research, ISEPR. 2016. 276 p. 

Content No. 1, 2017

рабочая ссылка на официальный сайт париматч переходи по ней и играй в свое удовольствие 

&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=183&rft.epage=191&rft.tpage=183-191&rft.number=&rft.year=2017&rft.issn=0321-2017&rft.shorttitle=&rft.subject=США; политические партии; консерватизм; Дональд Трамп; выборы; ИСЭПИ; Б. Межуев& B.I.">

See also:

Kazun A.D., Kazun A.P.,
Neither a Friend. Not a Foe: Donald Trump in the Russian Media. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No1

Simonia N.A.,
Results of Presidential Elections in the United States and New Prospects for Formation of Multipolar World Order. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No2

Sokolshchik L.M.,
American Conservatism and the Callenge of Contemporary Populism: Theoretical and Ideological Aspects. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No1

Shakleina T.A.,
Donald Trump and “New Populism” in America. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No5

Polyakov L.V.,
Russians electoral behaviour. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No6



   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991