The Phenomenon of Euroscepticism in the Context of Electoral Processes in Modern Europe

The Phenomenon of Euroscepticism in the Context of Electoral Processes in Modern Europe

Yakunin V.I.,

Dr. Sci. (Pol. Sci.), Head of the Public Policy Department, Lomonosov Moscow State University,

elibrary_id: 489038 |

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2017.05.08

For citation:

Yakunin V.I. The Phenomenon of Euroscepticism in the Context of Electoral Processes in Modern Europe. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No. 5. P. 106-121. (In Russ.).


The article is dedicated to the complex consideration of the sociological and demographic portrait of the modern euroscepticism. The author claims that it cannot be explicitly stated that eurosceptics can only form diversified groups, united by the temporal rather than long-term interests. In this context, it is worth mentioning that the very fact of the euroscepticism’s existence as a social and political phenomenon was an unclear topic among the academic society for at least last 15 years. For now it’s clear that in order to understand the logic of the last political events we need to analyze comprehensively the social structure of the phenomenon. In order to evaluate the core trends of euroscepticism the author also refers to the national statistics data on the public preferences and exit polls from different elections in the EU countries. The above-mentioned approach enabled the author to make the following conclusions. Firstly, the electoral support of eurosceptic parties strongly correlates with the economic position of a voting social group. Secondly, euroscepticism is a popular phenomenon among young men and this fact, supposedly, can also be understood in connection with the previous statement. Thirdly, there is a correlation between euroscepticism and the deep traditions of nationalismб which still matter for a part of the EU middle class. The analysis of the eurosceptic parties’ programs showed that there is a huge political division between those parties. For instance, some of them tend to criticize the EU in a comparatively “soft” way, whereas others take a more radical position. At the same time, in some leading EU member states eurosceptics became a significant national force, what puts the question of euroscepticism in the actual agenda of the EU. 

euroscepticism; European integration; electoral processes; Great Britain; Brexit; Germany; France; Italy.


Albertini D., Doucet D. Histoire du Front national. Paris: Tallandier. 2013. 360 p. Archer Cl. Euroscepticism in the Nordic Region. – Journal of European Integration. 2000. Vol. 22. No. 1. P. 87-114. DOI:

Bačkovský S. Euroskeptizismusforschung und Parteien Mittel- und Osteuropas. 2016. 325 p. URL:  (accessed: 18.04. 2017).

Basov F.A. Germany in the European Union: from the Economic Locomotive to Political Leadership. – Outlines of Global Transformations: politics, economics, law. 2017. No. 1. P. 33–52. (In Russ.)

Berbuir N., Lewandowsky M. The AfD and its Sympathisers: Finally a Right-Wing Populist Movement in Germany? – German Politics. 2015. No. 24. P. 154-178. DOI:

Dalton R.J., Weldon St. Germans Divided? Political Culture in a United Germany. – German Politics. 2010. Vol. 19. No. 1. P. 9-23. DOI:

Eremina N.V. The Roots of Brexit: Conflict of Identities in the United Kingdom. – Outlines of Global Transformations: politics, economics, law. 2017. No. 1. P. 87-105. (In Russ.)

Euro-skepticism. A Reader. Ed. by R. Tiersky. Lanham, Boulder, New York, Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield. 2001. 328 p. Franzosi P., Marone F., Salvati E. Populism and Euroscepticism in the Italian Five Star Movement. – The International Spectator. 2015. Vol. 50. No.2. P. 109–124. DOI:

George St. Britain: Anatomy of a Eurosceptic State. – Journal of European Integration. 2000. Vol. 22. No. 1. P. 15-33. DOI:

Germanija. Vyzovy XXI veka. Pod. red. V.B. Belova [Germany. Challenges of the 21st Century. Ed. by V.B. Belov]. Moscow: Ves’ Mir Publ. 792 p. (In Russ.)

Glencross A. British Euroscepticism and British Exceptionalism: The Forty-Year “Neverendum” on the Relationship with Europe. – Studia Diplomatica. 2014. Vol. LXVII. No. 4. P. 1-9.

Grygiel J. The Return of Europe’s Nation-States. The Upside to the EU’s Crisis. – Foreign Affairs. 2016. Vol. 95. No. 5. P. 94-101.

Heribert A.. Xenophobia, Asylum Seekers, and Immigration Policies in Germany. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics. 2015. Vol. 21. No. 4. P. 446-464. DOI:

Hix S. Euroscepticism as Anti-Centralization. A Rational Choice Institutionalist Perspective. – European Union Politics. 2007. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 131-150. DOI:

Hooghe L., Marks G. Sources of Euroscepticism. – Acta Politica. 2007. No. 42. P. 119-147. Igounet V. Le Front national de 1972 à nos jours. Le parti, les hommes, les idées. Paris: Éditions du Seuil. 2014. 495 p.

Iversen T., Cusack Th.R. The Causes of Welfare State Expansion: Deindustrialization or Globalization? – World Politics. 2000. Vol. 52. No. 3. P. 313-349.

Lutwak E. Why Fascism is the Wave of the Future. – London Review of Books. 1994. Vol. 16. No. 7. P. 3-6.

Maggini N. Understanding the Electoral Rise of the Five Star Movement in Italy. 2013. 30 p. URL: (accessed 07.03.2017).

Maslova E A., Shibkova M.O. Attitudes of Italian Parties to the Sanctions against Russia. – Sovremennaya Evropa. 2017. No 3. P. 122-132. (In Russ.)

Quaglia L. The Ebb and Flow of Euroscepticism in Italy. – South European Society and Politics. 2011. Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 31-50. DOI:

Riishøj S. Europeanisation and Euroscepticism. Experiences from Poland and the Czech Republic. – The Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity. 2007. Vol. 35. No. 3. P. 503-535. DOI:

Sørensen С. Love Me, Love Me Not ... A Typology of Public Euroscepticism. Brighton: University of Sussex. 2008. 101 p.

Taggart P. Populism. Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open University Press. 2000. 140 p. Treib O. The Voter Says No, But Nobody Listens: Causes and Consequences of the Eurosceptic Vote in the 2014 European Elections. – Journal of European Public Policy. 2014. Vol. 21. No. 10. P. 1541-1554. DOI:

Vainshtein Gr. I. Euroscepticism: new factor of European politics. – Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2015. No. 1. P. 40-48. (In Russ.)

Verba S., Burns N., Schlozman K. Knowing and Caring about Politics. – Gender and Political Engagement. 1997. Vol. 59. No. 4. P. 1051-1072.

Vershinin A.A. French Political Thought about the Crisis of the Modern Model of Eurointegration. – Outlines of Global Transformations: politics, economics, law. No. 1. P. 69-86. (In Russ.) 

Content No. 5, 2017

See also:

De Landtsheer C., Hollander Sh., Maene P.,
Brexit and Political Personality: The Psychological Profiles of Boris Johnson and Jeremy Corbyn. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No6

Rethinking Modernity (Materials of an International Scientific Conference) (II). – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No3

Kolosov V.A., Borodulina N.A., Vendina O.I., Galkina T.A., Zayatz D.V., Yur Ye.S.,
Geopolitical Vision of the World in Mass-Media. – Polis. Political Studies. 2003. No3

Tokarev A.A.,
Labyrinths of the «Great migration». – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No4

Bardin A.L.,
Integration of Immigrants with Different Cultural Background: the German Experience. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No6



   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991