Challenges to Social and Human Sciences in Russia
The article analyzes the key problems faced by social sciences and humanities in Russia. The author takes note of the need for accumulating resources available to the state and the professional communities – both to enhance the social role of the humanities and to expand the influence of Russian scholarly schools on the global academic discourse. The situation needs to be rectified in the current absence of demand on the part of the government and society for fundamental social and humanitarian research. At the same time, the increase in the role of these sciences presupposes their alignment with modern standards. In particular, it is necessary to take steps aimed at developing informational and ideological exchanges between representatives of different sciences, overcoming the phenomena inherent in domestic science for decades, such as descriptiveness of research and lack of competences of researchers. Many leading domestic experts in social sciences and humanities don’t have sufficient competence to perform scientific work in English. It is essential not only to ensure normal communication with global science, but also to fully master the tools to confirm the validity of the analytical judgments expressed. All this will help to overcome the peripheral situation of Russian social sciences and humanities, their isolation from the world science.
Fomin I.V. Integrating the Humanities: Semiotics or Memetics? – Polis. Political Studies. 2015. No. 3. P. 72-84. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2015.03.05
George A.L., Bennett A. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 2005. 350 p.
Humanities: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow (Round Table discussion). – Humanus. 2015. No. 2. P. 6-41 (In Russ.)
Humanities: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow (Round Table discussion). – Humanus. 2015. No. 3. P. 5-25. (In Russ.)
Istomin I., Baykov A. Russian and International Publication Practices: A Comparative Study of IR Schorlarly Journals. – International Trends. Vol. 13. № 2 (41). April-June 2015. P. 114-140. https://doi.org/ 10.17994/IT.2015.13.2.41.9
King G., Keohane R.O., Verba S. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton university press. 1994. 264 p.
Krasnykh V.V. What Has the Coming Day in Store for Us? (To the Question of Modern Scientific Paradigm in Humanitarian Knowledge). – Speech Genres. 2017. No. 2 (16). P. 172-192. (In Russ.)
Kravchenko S.A., Konnov V.I. Problem of Trust in Scientific Knowledge: Risks and Ways to Overcome Them. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No. 5. P. 108-121. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2016.05.09
Ragin C.C. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 2009. 240 p.
Sokolov B.G. Local Humanities and Education in front of the Third Millennium Challenges. – Studia culturae. 2016. No. 3. P. 41-49. (In Russ.)
Torkunov A.V. The Past and the Future of International Political Studies. – International Trends. 2016. Vol. 14. No. 1 (44). P. 77-85. (In Russ.)
Torkunov A.V. The Lazarev Institute: Cradle of Russian Oriental Studies. – Polis. Political Studies. 2015. No. 6. P. 9-22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2015.06.03
Torkunov A.V. Education as a Soft Power Tool in Russian Foreign Policy. – MGIMO Review of International Relations. 2012. No. 4. P. 85-93. (In Russ.)
Torkunov A.V. Targets and Challenges of University Community in Russia. – International Trends. 2011. Vol. 9. No. 1 (25). P. 50-57. (In Russ.)
Yanitsky O.N. Modernizing Humanitarian Knowledge: Practice, Method and Theory. – Sociological Journal. 2017. No. 4. P. 69-88. (In Russ.)
Zarubina N.N., Noskova A.V., Temnitskii A.L. Trust in Social Science. – International Trends. 2017. Vol. 15. No. 1 (48). P. 186-199. (In Russ.)
Kravchenko S.A., Konnov V.I.,
Problem of Trust in Scientific Knowledge: Risks and Ways to Overcome Them. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No5
In search of a new methodological paradigm in political science: the identity approach. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No4
Yeremenko G.O., Kokarev K.P.,
eLibrary.ru and Russian Science Citation Index in the information infrastructure of russian science: conversation with Gennadiy Yeremenko, Director General, eLibrary.ru. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No1
Alekseyeva T.A., Mineev A.P., Loshkariov I.D.,
"Quantum-like" Theory of Decision Making in Political Science. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No4
Influence of Cultural Context on Formation of Science Policy (French Experience). – Polis. Political Studies. 2015. No5