The Chinese Angle in the World-system Management

The Chinese Angle in the World-system Management

Bogaturov A.D.,

Chairman of the Editorial Board of the International Trends Journal,

elibrary_id: 276291 |

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2019.05.07
Rubric: DIXI!

For citation:

Bogaturov A.D. The Chinese Angle in the World-system Management. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No. 5. P. 85-95. (In Russ.).


China moved to the forefront of world politics, which resulted in a rearrangement of the balance of forces between the five nuclear powers represented in the U.N. Security Council. Russia has taken a benevolent stance towards China’s new status, France pronounced to remain neutral, whilst the United States and Britain have refrained from expressing any clear opinion. The rest of the states are watching with interest or anxiety. The United States under Trump maintains an offensive position in all conflict-prone areas. Beijing, on the other hand, maintains a balanced point of view: not to join any ‘alliances’ and not to back any of the great powers. Moscow opposes the U.S.A., trying to abstain from any military coalescing. The continental E.U. is concerned with resolving the conflict in Ukraine and, at the same time, seeking opportunities for new beneficial relations in the Middle East, Asia, and Latin America. The author, on the basis of a comparative analysis of these international relations dynamics, shows the inconsistencies of the policies of ‘nuclear countries’ at the intersection of changes stemming from the greater ‘free hand’ of the United States, Russia and Britain. The countries of the Nuclear Five in the U.N. adhere to the policy of ‘keeping a balanced position’ in potentially explosive situations.

world system, five-party regulation, nuclear powers, U.N., China, Russia, U.S.A., E.U., balance of forces, world politics.


Acharya А., Buzan В. 2010. Non-western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and Beyond Asia (Politics in Asia). London, New York: Routledge.


Baranovsky V.G. 2019. New International Order: Overcoming or Transforming the Existing Pattern? – World Economy and International Relations. Vol. 63. No. 5. P. 7-23. (In Russ.)

Degtyarev D.S. 2016. Prikladnoj kolichestvennyj analiz i modelirovanie mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenij [Applied Quantitative Analysis and Modeling of International Relations]. Moscow: RUDN. (In Russ.)

Khrustalev M.A. 2008. Analiz mezhdunarodnyh situacij i politicheskaya ekspertiza [Analysis of International Situations and Political Expertise]. Moscow: NOFMO. (In Russ.)

Kosolapov N.A. 2006. Research of International Relations: Logic of Ideas, Interests, Policies. – World Economy and International Relations. № 4. P. 93-99. (In Russ.)

Shakleina T.A. 2017. Rossiya i SShA v mirovoj politike [Russia and the USA in World Politics]. Moscow: Aspect Press. (In Russ.)

Sistemnaya istoriya mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenij. Opyat’ razdelennyj mir [System History of International Relations. Again Divided World]. 2019. Ed. by A.D. Bogaturov. Moscow: Yurayt. (In Russ.)

Tsygankov P.A. 2017. Teoriya mezhdunarodnyh otnoshenij [Theory of International Relations]. Moscow: Yurayt. (In Russ.)

Voskressenskij A.D. 2006. “Bol’shaya Vostochnaya Aziya”. Mirovaya politika i energeticheskaya bezopasnost’ [“Greater East Asia”. World Politics and Energy Security]. Moscow: Lenand. (In Russ.)

Content No. 5, 2019

See also:

Rutland P.,
Russia and China: Saga of Two Transitions to Market Economy. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No3

Graham T.,
China-Russia-US Relations and Strategic Triangles. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No6

Ide K.,
Negotiations between the U.S.S.R./Russia and China on the settlement of border issues. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No3

Alekseyeva T.A.,
Reflections on modern world politics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No3

Nikitin A.I.,
Modern World Order, Its Crisis and Prospects. – Polis. Political Studies. 2018. No6

Screen version