The Effectiveness of Regional Power: from Theory to Measurement (Case Study of the North Caucasus Federal District Republics)

The Effectiveness of Regional Power: from Theory to Measurement (Case Study of the North Caucasus Federal District Republics)

Litvinova T.N.,

Professor of the Regional Governance and National Politics Department, Odintsovo Campus of MGIMO University,

elibrary_id: 368821 |

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2020.02.10
Rubric: Russia Today

For citation:

Litvinova T.N. The Effectiveness of Regional Power: from Theory to Measurement (Case Study of the North Caucasus Federal District Republics). – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No. 2. P. 137-152. (In Russ.).


The article is devoted to the problem of assessing the effectiveness of executives in the regions of Russia, based on the example of the North Caucasus Federal District republics. They often appear among the lagging subsidized subjects of the Russian Federation, with low industry, high fertility, high unemployment, and other socio-economic challenges for administration. The government effectiveness can be viewed from different points: 1) from the angle of the implementation of their social functions by the authorities; 2) understanding efficiency as the correlation of societal demands towards the system, and the authorities’ decisions; and 3) in terms of the quality of state and legal institutions that promote efficiency. The program-targeted approach and the digitalization of the economy pose new challenges to improve the quality of governance and the provision of public services, and to provoke a change in regulatory framework. The article studies the list of indicators of the regional executive functioning, introduced by the Decree of the President of Russia and adopted in April 2019. Comparing the new indicators with the previous assessment system, the author analyzes the socio-economic statistics data of the North Caucasus republics and shows their applicability to the assessment of the regional governance. Particular attention is paid to the indicator “trust in power”, which replaced the previous indicator of the population’s social satisfaction. The article offers ways to optimize the methodology and criteria for measuring the effectiveness of power.

government effectiveness, criteria for assessment effectiveness, regional authorities, socioeconomic indicators, trust in power, the North Caucasus Federal District.


Afonso A., Schuknecht L., Tanzi V. 2003. Public Sector Efficiency: an International Comparison. – European Central Bank, Working Paper. No. 242. URL: (accessed 17.06.2019).

Bentham J. 2001. The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: Writings on the Poor Laws. Vol. 1. Ed. M. Quinn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bouckaert G., Van de Walle S. 2003. Comparing Measures of Citizen Trust and User Satisfaction as Indicators of ‘Good Governance’: Difficulties in Linking Trust and Satisfaction Indicators. – International Review of Administrative Sciences. Vol. 69. No. 3. P. 329-343.

Brinkerhoff D., Goldsmith A. 2005. Institutional Dualism and International Development: a Revisionist Interpretation of Good Governance. – Administration & Society. Vol. 37. No. 2. P. 199-224.

Brunet M., Aubry M. 2016. The Three Dimensions of a Governance Framework for Major Public Projects. – International Journal of Project Management. No. 34. Р. 1596-1607.

Flyvbjerg B. 2014. What You Should Know about Megaprojects and Why: An Overview. – Project Management Journal. Vol. 45. No. 2. Р. 6-19.

Kaufmann D., Kraay A., Mastruzzi M. 2010. The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues. – Draft Policy Research Working Paper. URL: (accessed 18.07.2019).

La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A., Vishny R. 1999. The Quality of Government. – Journal of Law, Economics and Organizations. Vol. 15. No. 1. Р. 222-279.

Mandl U., Dierx A., Ilzkovitz F. 2008. The Effectiveness and Efficiency of Public Spending. – Economic and Financial Affairs. Economic papers. No. 301. URL: (accessed 17.06.2019).

Minaiu D.M., Opreana A., Cristescu M.P. 2010. Efficiency, Effectiveness and Performance of the Public Sector. – Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting. No. 4. P. 132-147.

Musgrave R.A. 1939. The Voluntary Exchange Theory of Public Economy. – The Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 53. No. 2. P. 213-237.

Vavrek R. 2018. Efficiency and Inefficiency of Public Administration. – Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People. Vol. 7. No. 1. P. 6-14.


Akhremenko A.S. 2012. Estimation of the State’s Effectiveness in the Production of Public Services: a Theoretical Model and the Methods of Measuring. – Polis. Political Studies. No. 1. P. 113-135. (In Russ.) URL: (accessed 22.01.2020).

Astvatsaturova M.A. 2019. Activity-Functional Cases of Political and Managerial Elitogenesis in the North Caucasian Federal District. – Pyatigorsk State University Bulletin. No. 1. Р. 213-217. (In Russ.)

Etnokonfessional’naya situatsiya v sub”yektakh Rossiyskoy Federatsii Severo-Kavkazskogo federal’nogo okruga [Ethnic and Confessional Situation in the Constituent entities of the Russian Federation of the North Caucasus Federal District]. 2018. Stavropol: SKFU. (In Russ.)

Kovarda V.V. 2018. The Development Areas of Laws and Regulations to Assess the Effectiveness of Executive Authorities in Russian Regions. – Society: Politics, Economics, Law. No. 8. P. 49-52. (In Russ.)

Litvinova T.N. 2018. Confidence in Government as a Prerequisite for Public Consensus (on the Example of North Caucasian Republics of the Russian Federation). – Politics and Society. No. 3. P. 35-51. (In Russ.)

Mamaraev R.M. 2014. Discussions About the Direct Election of the Heads of the subjects of the North Caucasus and the Opinion of the Dagestan Voters. – Proceedings of the Political School “Caspian”. No. 2. Ed. By A.-N.Z. Dibirov. Makhachkala: Lotos. P. 203-221. (In Russ.)

Mamaraev R.M. 2017. The Influence of the Social and Economic Factor on The Electoral Behavior of People of The Republic of Dagestan According to The Results of the Opinion Poll. – Bulletin MSRU. Series: History and Political Science. No. 5. P. 241-252. (In Russ.)

Popov N.P., Khaikin S.R. 2014. North Caucasus: Difficult Dialogue with Power. – Communicology. Vol. 6. No. 4. P. 124-155. (In Russ.)

Rozanova N.N. 2018. Standard Approach to Efficiency Assessment Activity of the Regional Power: Extent of Accounting of the Reputational Component. – Azimuth of Scientific Research: Economics and Administration. Vol. 7. No. 3 (24). P. 382-387. (In Russ.)

Skorokhodova V.P. 2019. Presidential Elections in the North Caucasus: Prospects and Potential Risks. – National Interests: Priorities and Security. Vol. 15. No. 5. P. 835-850. (In Russ.) 

Turovsky R.F. 2013. Social and Political Effectiveness of Regional Power: the Problem of Measurement. – Politeia. No. 1. P. 175-196. (In Russ.) 

Content No. 2, 2020

See also:

Akhremenko A.S.,
Estimation of the state’s effectiveness in the production of public services: a theoretical model and the methods of measuring. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No1

Turovsky R.F., Luizidis E.M.,
Exploring the causes of gubernatorial resignations in Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No4

Nisnevich Yu.A.,
Public power and corruption: socio-anthropological approach. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No6

Belousov A.B.,
Paradoxes of the Power Vertical: Retrospection, Imagination, Trauma. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No6

Satarov G.A.,
Trust as an Object of Political Sociology. Part I. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No1

Screen version