Skeletons in a Slavic Closet. Controversies of Historical Memory and Nation-Building in Serbia and Croatia after the Collapse of the SFRY

Skeletons in a Slavic Closet. Controversies of Historical Memory and Nation-Building in Serbia and Croatia after the Collapse of the SFRY


Efremenko D.V.,

MGIMO University, Moscow, Russia; Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, efdv2015@mail.ru


elibrary_id: 101363 |


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2021.05.09

For citation:

Efremenko D.V. Skeletons in a Slavic Closet. Controversies of Historical Memory and Nation-Building in Serbia and Croatia after the Collapse of the SFRY. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No. 5. P. 127-145. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2021.05.09


The reported study was supported within the framework of the project No. 2023-03-01 of the Institute for International Studies of MGIMO (University) of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation “Post-Communist Europe as a space for the production of the politics of memory”.


Abstract

The article explores the experience of the political use of the historical past in the post-Yugoslav space on the example of two key states in the region – Serbia and Croatia. Serbo-Croatian rivalry, twice in the 20th century turning into bloody confrontation, left a deep imprint on the politics of memory of these polities. Serbian and Croatian historical narratives describing the events of the Second World War and the armed conflicts of 1991-1995 not only compete with each other, but offer incompatible interpretations. There are reasons to speak in this case about the emergence of a mnemonic security dilemma. The dilemma in question implies that the systematic challenge of a certain narrative, significant for the “biography” of the community and the state behind it, ultimately undermines the confidence of the community representatives in the stability of its existence. In these conditions, the conflict of memories becomes an important and even a constituent element of the formation of a macro-political identity. As the dynamics of Serbo-Croatian relations show, the dilemma of mnemonic security is quite inertial and stable; it can persist and hinder post-conflict settlement, even in a significantly changed international political context when the main prerequisites for confrontation are becoming a thing of the past. The article also analyzes the contradictory influence of the European integration processes on the politics of memory in Croatia and Serbia. 

Keywords
politics of memory, disintegration of the SFRY, Serbia, Croatia, ethno-nationalism, identity, ethnic mobilization, the dilemma of mnemonic security, post-conflict settlement, European integration.


References

Bellamy A.J. 2003. The Formation of Croatian National Identity. A Centuries-Old Dream? Manchester: Manchester University Press. 222 p. https://doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9780719065026.001.0001

Berenskoetter F. 2014. Parameters of a National Biography. – European Journal of International Relations. Vol. 20. No. 1. P. 262-288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066112445290

Bieber F. 2002. Nationalist Mobilization and Stories of Serb Suffering: The Kosovo Myth from 600th Anniversary to the Present. – Rethinking History. The Journal of Theory and Practice. Vol. 6. No. 1. P. 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/136425200110112137

Bozic-Roberson A. 2004. Words Before the War: Milosevic’s Use of Mass Media and Rhetoric to Provoke Ethnopolitical Conflict in Former Yugoslavia. – East European Quarterly. Vol. 38. No. 4. P. 395-408.

Brubaker R. 1996. Nationalizing States in the Old ‘New Europe’ – and the New. – Ethnic and Racial Studies. Vol. 19. No. 2. P. 411-437. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.1996.9993918

Đurašković S. 2016. National Identity Building and the „Ustaša Nostalgia“ in Croatia: The Past That Will Not Pass. – Nationalities Papers. The Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity. Vol. 44. No. 5. P. 772-788. https://doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2016.1171301

Reconciliation and Official Memory Politics: Commemorations of the Victory and of the Victims of Operation Storm in Croatia and Serbia (ed. by ĐureinovićJ.). 2020. Zagreb: RECOM Reconciliation Network. URL: https://www.recom.link/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Commemorations-of-the-victory-and-of-the-victims-of-operation-Storm.pdf (accessed 07.07.2021).

Finkel E. 2010. In Search of Lost Genocide: Historical Policy and International Politics in Post-1989 Eastern Europe. – Global Society. Vol. 24. No. 1. P. 51-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600820903432027

Jović D. 2017. Rat i mit: Politika identiteta u suvremenoj Hrvatskoj. Zaprešić: Fraktura. 416 p

KnezevićM. 1999. Ciklus Kosovskog mita. – Nova Srpska Politička Misao. No. 6. P. 171-183.

Kaplan R.D. 1993. Balkan Ghosts: A Journey through History. New York: St. Martin’s Press. 307 p.

Krastev I., Holmes S. 2020. The Light That Failed: Why the West Is Losing the Fight for Democracy. New York: Pegasus Books. 256 p.

Milošević A., Touquet H. 2018. Unintended Consequences: the EU Memory Framework and the Politics of Memory in Serbia and Croatia. – Southeast European and Black Sea Studies. Vol. 18. No. 3. P. 381-399. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2018.1489614

Oberschall A. 2000. The Manipulation of Ethnicity: From Ethnic Cooperation to Violence and War in Yugoslavia. – Ethnic and Racial Studies. Vol. 23. No. 6. P. 982-1001. https://doi.org/10.1080/014198700750018388

Pavlaković V. 2009. From Conflict to Commemoration: Serb-Croat Relations and the Anniversaries of Operation Storm. – Serbo-Croat Relations: Political Cooperation and National Minorities. Ed. by D. Gavrilović. Sremska Kamenica: CHDR. P. 73-82.

Perica V. 2002. Balkan Idols: Religion and Nationalism in Yugoslav States. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 332 p. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195148568.001.0001

Ramet S. P. 2011. Croatia and Serbia since 1991: An Assessment of Their Similarities and Differences. – Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics. Vol. 27. No. 2. P. 263-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13 523279.2011.564098

Rumelili B. 2015. Ontological (In)security and Peace Anxieties: A Framework for Conflict Resolution. – Conflict Resolution and Ontological Security: Peace Anxieties. Ed. by B. Rumelili. Abingdon: Routledge. P. 10-29.

Sindbæk T. 2012. Usable History? Representations of Yugoslavia’s Difficult Past – from 1945 to 2002. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press. 280 p.

Tuđman F. 1981. Nationalism in Contemporary Europe. Boulder, CO: East European Monographs. 293 p.

Vujčić I. 1998. Povijest: Hrvatska i svijet u XX. stoljeću: udžbenik za četvrti razred gimnazije. Zagreb: Birotehnika. Centar za dopisno obrazovanje. 263 p. (In Croatian).

 

Efremenko D.V., Malinova O.Y., Miller A.I. 2018. Politics of Memory and Historical Science. – Russian History. No. 5. P. 128-140. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31857/S086956870001569-6

Entina E.G. 2018. Euro-Atlantic Integration of Post-Yugoslav Republics and the Russian Factor. – Current Problems of Europe. No. 1. P. 192-208 (In Russ.)

Hobsbawm E.J. 1998. Nations and Nationalism since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality. (Russ. ed.: Hobsbawm E.J. Natsii i natsionalizm posle 1780 goda. St. Petersburg: Aletheia. 306 p.).

Mann M. 2016. The Dark Side of Democracy. Explaining Ethnic Cleansing. (Russ. ed.: Mann M. Temnaya storona demokratii. Ob”yasnenie ehtnicheskikh chistok. Moscow: Pyatyi Rim Publishing. 928 p.).

Pivovarenko A.A. 2014. Stanovlenie gosudarstvennosti v sovremennoĬ Khorvatii (1990–2001 gg.). Dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenostepeni kandidata istoricheskikh nauk [Formation of statehood in modern Croatia (1990-2001). Dissertation for the degree of candidate of historical sciences]. Moscow: Institut slavyanovedeniya RAN, Formation of Statehood of Modern Croatia (1990-2001). Candidate of Science Dissertation. Moscow: Institute for Slavic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 313 p. URL: https://www.dissercat.com/content/stanovlenie-gosu­darstvennosti-v-sovremennoi-khorvatii-1990-2001 (accessed 11.07.2021).

Sevastyanova Ya.V., Efremenko D.V. 2020. Securitization of Memory and Dilemma of Mnemonic Security. – Political Science (RU). No. 2. P. 66-86. http://www.doi.org/10.31249/poln/2020.02.0 (In Russ.).

Vishnyakov Y.V., Ponomareva E.G. 2018. Serbia in the Balkans: The Invention of “Europe’s Gun powder Magazine”. – Sovremennaya Evropa. No. 7. P. 108-122 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15211/soveurope72018115129 

Content No. 5, 2021

See also:


Timofeev I.N.,
Security Dilemma. Risk of Armed Conflict between the Great Powers. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No4

Ponamaryova A.M., Tatuntz S.A.,
Immigration as problem of national security of the RF. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No4

Diesen G.,
Coercing “European Integration”? Assessing the Offensive Posture of the EU CSDP. – Polis. Political Studies. 2015. No6

Fadeyeva L.A.,
Matrix of Memory, Politics and Place (On Cultures of Public Memory as Constituent Part of Political Cultures). – Polis. Political Studies. 2006. No1

Rutland P.,
The presence of absence: ethnicity policy in Russia. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No2

 
 

Archive

   2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991