Digital technologies and new goals of innovation policy

Digital technologies and new goals of innovation policy


Ivanova N.I.,

Doctor of Economics, Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, n.i.ivanova@imemo.ru


elibrary_id: 105454 |


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2022.01.06
Rubric: Russia Today

For citation:

Ivanova N.I. Digital technologies and new goals of innovation policy. – Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No. 1. P. 53-66. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2022.01.06


The article was prepared with support from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation for the project “World order after the crisis: challenges and technologies, competition and cooperation” (№ 075-15-2020-783).


Abstract

The article offers an analysis of the digital technologies influence on the national innovation system transformation and related changes in goals and government innovation policy. The author elaborates the idea that the leading global companies of digital economy based their technological and market power on intensive research and development activity. Prolonged investment in new knowledge, new technologies and global innovation make IT companies the leaders and dominant segment of innovation systems. It is constantly growing, rising their own material and financial resources turning independent from the government. Moreover, they have their own technology policy being sometimes in contradiction with the governments of different levels. National as well as foreign. The problem is especially strong because the leading IT companies acting as monopolists on the foreign markets. The technology protection policy and other new form of new digital regulation are going globally. 

Keywords
innovation competition, digital platforms, technology corporations, technological sovereignty, monopolization.


References

Acemoglu, D. (2021). Remaking the post-COVID world. Finance and Development. IMF.

Aghion, Ph., Antonin, C., & Bunel, S. (2021). The power of creative destruction: economic upheaval and the wealth of nations. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

Banik, N., & Padalkar, М. (2021). The spread of gig economy: trends and effects. Foresight and STI Governance, 15(1), 28-38. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2021.1.19.29

Blandin-Obernesser, A. (2016). Les entreprises souveraines de l’Internet: un défi pour le droit en Europe. In A. Blandin-Obernesser, Droits et souveraineté numérique en Europe (pp. 95-105). Bruxelles: Bruylant.

Morin-Desailly, С. (2014). Nouveau rôle et nouvelle stratégie pour l’Union européenne dans la gou­vernance mondiale de l’Internet. Rapport d’information n° 696 (2013-2014). Tome I. https://www.senat.fr/rap/r13-696-1/r13-696-11.pdf 

 

Ivanova, N.I. (2019). Technological Breakthrough in the Modern Economy. Еkonomika. Nalogi. Pravo, 12(3), 6-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849X‑2019-12-3-6-16

Mamedyarov, Z.A. (2020). Innovatsii i fondovyi rynok [Innovations and the Stock Market]. In N.I. Ivanova (Ed.), Innovatsionnaya konkurentsiya [Innovation competition] (pp. 119-135). Moscow: Ves Mir. (In Russ.)

Piketty, T. (2016). Le Capital au ХХIe siècle. (Russ. ed.: Piketty, T. Kapital v XXI veke. Moscow: Ves Mir).

Shelyubskaya, N.V. (2020). Praktika regulirovaniya konkurentsii v ES [The practice of competition regulation in the EU]. In N.I. Ivanova (Ed.), Innovatsionnaya konkurentsiya [Innovation competition] (pp. 151-173). Moscow: Ves Mir. (In Russ.)

Srnicek, N. (2020). Platform capitalism. (Russ. ed.: Srnicek, N. Kapitalizm platform. Moscow: Ves Mir). 

 

  

  

Content No. 1, 2022

See also:


Degterev D.A., Piskunov D.A., Eremin A.A.,
U.S. – China rivalry in Latin America: at the origins of technological decoupling. – Polis. Political Studies. 2023. No3

Inozemtzev V.L.,
Technological Progress and Social Polarization in the 21st Century. – Polis. Political Studies. 2000. No6

Zinovieva E.S.,
Internet fragmentation and the formation of digital borders: an analysis from the standpoint of critical geography. – Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No2

Koss M.,
Inter-Party Competition and Federalism in Germany. – Polis. Political Studies. 2004. No6

Information,
The Sovereignty, the secessions and the fortune of the de facto states. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No4

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
5 2008


Zamyatin D.N.
Pictorial Imperialism

 The article text
 

Archive

   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991