Russian higher education under sanctions: a constructivist perspective

Russian higher education under sanctions:
a constructivist perspective

Crowley-Vigneau A.,

MGIMO University. Moscow, Russia,

elibrary_id: 1090824 |

Baykov A.A.,

MGIMO University. Moscow, Russia,

elibrary_id: 621264 |

Kalyuzhnova Y.,

Centre for Euro-Asian Studies, Henley Business School, Reading, UK,

Article received: 2022.04.15 18:14. Accepted: 2022.05.17 18:14
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2022.04.05

For citation:

Crowley-Vigneau A., Baykov A.A., Kalyuzhnova Y. Russian higher education under sanctions: a constructivist perspective. – Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No. 4. P. 47-62. (In Russ.).


Constructivists have convincingly shown through norm theory and multiple case studies that ideas can be more influential than material conditions in determining political and social outcomes. This paper analyses the capacity of norms to resist shock events that bring about a radical change in material conditions and demonstrates that significant disruptions in the context of norm implementation can lead to normative U-turns. The authors theorise norm backtracking based on the case of the Russian higher education sector, revealing how the 2022 armed-conflict in Ukraine and Western sanctions have affected the implementation of the norm of world-class universities in Russia. The findings of the qualitative case study based on 24 expert interviews suggest that although internalised norms can survive shifts in material conditions, the need to readapt them to an evolving context and to new political goals results in their distortion. The international norm on world-class universities, implemented in Russia through Project 5-100 and the Priorities 2030 initiative, is facing exceptional challenges which have led so far not to the rejection of the norm but to its remodelling to meet new objectives. The impact of Russia’s normative “redesign” in the sphere of higher education also ushers in a new stage in the life of the international norm on world-class universities marked by a rejection of the Western-centric model. 

norm contestation, world-class universities, norm backtracking, Russia, sanctions, Priorities 2030 initiative.


Acharya, A. (2004). How ideas spread: whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International Organization, 58(2), 239-275.

Arar, K. (2013). Student mobilities, migration and the internationalization of higher education. Higher Education Policy, 26(2), 285-288.

Badescu, C.G., & Weiss, T.G. (2010). Misrepresenting R2P and advancing norms: an alternative spiral? International Studies Perspectives, 11(4), 354-374.

Becker, B. A., & Eube, C. (2018). Open innovation concept: Integrating universities and business in digital age. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4(1), 12.

Bloomfield, A. (2016). Norm antipreneurs and theorising resistance to normative change. Review of International Studies, 42(2), 310-333.

Brooks, R., & Waters, J. (2011). Student mobilities, migration and the internationalization of higher education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Chow, C., & Leung, C. (2016). Reshaping universities for survival in the 21st century: new opportunities and paradigms. Bentham Science Publishers.

Crowley-Vigneau, A. (2022). The global norm on world-class universities and Russian Project 5-100. In The National Implementation of International Norms (pp. 65-139). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 030-94862-7_3

Crowley-Vigneau, A., Baykov, A., & Gnevasheva, V. (2021a). Local content policies in the Russian Higher Education sector: harming or aiding internationalization? Educational Studies Moscow, 4, 147-165.

Crowley-Vigneau, A., Istomin, I.A., Baykov, A.A., & Kalyuzhnova, (2021b). Transnational policy net­works and change through internationalization (The record of Project 5-100). Polis. Political Studies, 5, 8-24.

Deitelhoff, N., & Zimmermann, L. (2020). Things we lost in the fire: how different types of contes­tation affect the robustness of international norms. International Studies Review, 22(1), 51-76.

Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887-917.

Gao, J., & Li, C. (2020). Version 2.0 of building world-class universities in China: initial outcomes and problems of the double world-class project. Higher Education Policy, 1-17.

Guo, Y., Guo, S., Yochim, L., & Liu, X. (2021). Internationalization of Chinese higher education: is it west­ernization? Journal of Studies in International Education, February.

Huang, F. (2015). Building the world-class research universities: a case study of China. Higher Education, 70(2), 203-215.

Katzenstein, P.J., Keohane, R.O., & Krasner, S.D. (Ed.). (1999). Exploration and contestation in the study of world politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

Kutz, C. (2014). How norms die: torture and assassination in American security policy. Ethics & International Affairs, 28(4), 425-449.

Lo, W.Y.W., & Hou, A.Y.C. (2019). A farewell to internationalisation? Striking a balance between global ambition and local needs in higher education in Taiwan. Higher Education, 1-14.

McKeown, R. (2009). Norm regress: US revisionism and the slow death of the torture norm. International relations, 23(1), 5-25.

Panke, D., & Petersohn, U. (2016). Norm challenges and norm death: The inexplicable? Cooperation and Conflict, 51(1), 3-19.

Payne, R.A. (2001). Persuasion, frames and norm construction. European journal of international relations, 7(1), 37-61.

Salmi, J. (2009). The challenge of establishing world-class universities. World Bank.

Wiener, A. (2014). A theory of contestation. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.


Pavlova, E.B., & Romanova, T.A. (2017). Normative power: some theory aspects and contemporary practice of Russia and the EU. Polis. Political Studies, 1, 162-176. (In Russ.)

Semenenko, I.S. (2021). Rethinking development in social sciences: on the threshold of an ethical turn. Polis. Political Studies, 2, 25-45. (In Russ.)

Torkunov, A. (2017). Russian universities in the process of internationalization: challenges and priorities. International trends, 15(1), 6-12. (In Russ.) 

Content No. 4, 2022

See also:

Istomin I.A., Crowley-Vigneau A.,
International norms in the face of technological change: challenges for constructivist theory of arms control. – Polis. Political Studies. 2023. No4

Rimsky V.L.,
Universal and corruptionist norms of interactions in russian politics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No4

Semenenko I.S., Lapkin V.V., Pantin V.I.,
Identity in the system of coordinates of the world development. – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No3

Torkunov A.V.,
Russia and political order in a changing world: values, institutions, prospects. – Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No5

Ilyin M.V.,
«Flaky pastry» of politics: orders, regimes and practices. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No3



Introducing an article

Polis. Political Studies
5 2008

Krasikov S.A.
Political Risks of Detraditionalization

 The article text


   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991