The influence of group loyalty on democratic transit in non-Western societies

The influence of group loyalty on democratic transit in non-Western societies

Grafov D.B.,

Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia,

elibrary_id: 816320 | ORCID: 0000-0002-7334-5398 |

Article received: 2020.11.17 17:31. Accepted: 2021.07.02 17:32
DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2022.04.11

For citation:

Grafov D.B. The influence of group loyalty on democratic transit in non-Western societies. – Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No. 4. P. 134-147. (In Russ.).


This paper proposes a systems-theoretical approach to the role of guanxi-based, amakudari-based and other traditional practices, founded on group loyalty and supervisor–subordinate relationships, in making transitions from authoritarian rule. There are a lot of examples of unsuccessful transitions in Orient and non-Western cultures and of the degradation of new democracies in Eastern-European and Asian States. Many hybrid or semi-democracies fall short in the provision of public services or the protection of economic or human rights. Younger democracies are more corrupt, exhibit less rule of law, uncompetitive elections, uncontrolled bureaucracy, shrinked individual freedoms and may slide to authoritarianism through populism. And there are also the well-known problems of collective and civil actions to provide collective goods. In non-Western States collective action adheres to traditions and indigenous forms of group loyalty. The traditional ways for realizing individual interests are based on patron-client relations in these societies. And from this point of view such relations appear to be the most reliable way of satisfying individual interests of gaining advantages from Power than fighting for common goods and civil values through the transition to a more democratic regime, including substantive political changes moving towards a fair distribution of common goods. The goal of the author is to identify the dependence of the changing behavior of individuals to components of engagement in patron-client relations. Traditional patron-client (superior–subordinate) relations as a structuring social exchange are based on some variables, such as benefits\contributions, loyalty, reciprocity, personal commitment, obligation, subordinate, collectivism, personal-life inclusion etc. The model helps to explain what variables change someone’s behavior from seeking civil values and common goods to prioritising individual or groups’ benefits relating to the patron-client relationships in non-Western cultures. 

transition, group loyalty, guanxi, jinmyaku, amakudari, wasta, clientelism.


Al-Ramahi, A. (2008). Wasta in Jordan: a distinct feature of (and benefit for) middle eastern society. Arab Law Quarterly, 22, 35-62.

Barbalet, J. (2014). The structure of guanxi: resolving problems of network assurance. Theory and Society, 43(4), 51-69.

Barbalet, J. (2015). Guanxi, tie strength, and network attributes. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(8), 1038-1050.

Barbalet, J. (2018). Guanxi as social exchange: emotions, power and corruption. Sociology, 52(5), 934-949.

Bian, Y. (2005). Guanxi. In J. Beckert, & M. Zafirovski (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Economic Sociology (pp. 312-314). London: Routledge.

Brzezinski, Z. (1989). Grand failure: the birth and death of communism in the twentieth century. New York, NY: Liberty.

Chen, X.-P., & Chen, C. (2004). On the intricacies of the Chinese guanxi. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21(3), 305-324.

Cheng, B.S., Farh, J.L., Chang, H.F., & Hsu, W.L. (2002). Gunaxi, zhoungcheng, compentence and managerial behavior in the Chinese context. The Journal of Chinese Psychology, 44(2), 151-166.

Chen, Y., Friedman, R., Yu, E., Fang, W., & Lu, X. (2009). Supervisor-subordinate guanxi: developing a three-dimensional model and scale. Management and Organization Review, 5(3), 375-399.

Colignon, R.A., & Usui, Ch. (2003). Amakudari: the hidden fabric of Japan’s economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Cunningham, R.B., & Sarayrah, Y.K. (1993). Wasta: the hidden force in middle eastern society. Westport, CT: Praeger.

El-Said, H., & McDonald, F. (2001). Institutions and joint ventures in the Middle East and North Africa. In H. El-Said & K. Becker (Еd.), Management and International Business Issues in Jordan (pp. 65-83). Binghamton, NY: Haworth.

Fan, Y. (2002). Questioning guanxi: definition, classification and implications. International Business Review, 11(5), 543-561.

García, C. (2014). Clientelism and guanxi: Southern European and Chinese public relations in com­parative perspective. Public Relations Review, 40, 798-806.

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Law, K.S., Wong, C.S., Wang, D., & Wang L. (2000). Effects of supervisor-subordinate guanxi on supervisory decisions in China: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 11, 715-730.

Li, L. (2011a). Lost in translation: the rule of guanxi, an alternative to the rule of law. In M. Tomasek, & G. Muhlemann (Ed.), Interpretation of Law in China: Roots and Perspectives (pp. 163-174). Prague: Karolinum Press.

Li, L. (2011b). Performing bribery in China: guanxi-practice, corruption with a human face. Journal of Contemporary China, 20(68), 1-20.

Li, L. (2018). Moral economy of corruption – guanxi networks in China’s courts. International Political Science Review.

Luo, Y. (2007). Guanxi and business. Singapore: World Scientific.

Ma, L., Tang, H., & Yan, B. (2015). Public employees’ perceived promotion channels in local China: merit-based or guanxi-orientated? Australian Journal of Public Administration, 74(3), 283-297.

Mizoguchi, T., & Quyen, N.V. (2009). Amakudari: the post-retirement employment of elite bureaucrats in Japan, Journal of Public Economic Theory, 14(5), 813-847.

Mohammed, A.A., & Hamdy, H. (2008). The stigma of vasta: the effect of vasta on perceived competence and morality. German University in Cairo, Working Paper Series, 5.

McCarthy, D., Puffer, S., Dunlap, D., & Jaeger, A. (2012). A stakeholder approach to the ethicality of BRIC-firm managers, use of favors. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(1), 27-38.

O’Donnell, G., & Schmitter, P.C. (1986). Transitions from authoritarian rule: tentative conclusions about uncertain democracies. Baltimore, London: The John Hopkins University Press.

Osburg, J. (2013). Anxious wealth: money and morality among China’s new rich. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Sievers, E. (2002). Uzbekistan’s mahalla: from soviet to absolutist residential community associations. The Journal of International and Comparative Law at Chicago-Kent, 2, 91-158.

Sun, X, Zhu, J., & Wu, Y. (2014). Organizational clientelism: An analysis of private entrepreneurs in Chinese local legislatures. Journal of East Asian Studies, 14(1), 1-29.

Tian, F.F. (2020). Is guanxi unfair? Market reform and the public attitude toward guanxi in urban China. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 7, 24.

Urinboyev, R. (2013). Living law and political stability in post-Soviet Central Asia. A case study of the Ferghana Valley in Uzbekistan. Lund Studies in Sociology of Law. Lund: Media-Tryck, Lund University.

Wang, P. (2016). Military corruption in China: the role of guanxi in the buying and selling of military positions. The China Quarterly, 228, 970-991.

Wank, D. (2004). Business-state clientelism in China: Decline or evolution? In T. Gold, D. Guthrie, & D. Wank (Ed.), Social Connections in China. Institutions, Culture, and the Changing Nature of Guanxi (pp. 97-116). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wong, P.N. (2010). The art of governing the self and others in the Christian Philippines. Journal of International and Global Studies, 1(2), 110-46.

Yang, M.M.-h. (1994). Gifts, Favors and banquets: The art of social relationship in China. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Zhan, J.V. (2012). Filling the gap of formal institutions: The effects of guanxi network on corruption in reform-era China. Crime, Law and Social Change, 58, 93-109.


Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J.A. (2016). Why nations fail: the origins of power, prosperity, and poverty (Russ. ed.: Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J.A. Pochemu odni strany bogatye, a drugie bednye. Proiskhozhdenie vlasti, protsvetaniya i nishchety. Moscow: AST).

Friedman, M. (2006) Capitalism and freedom. (Russ. ed.: Friedman, M. Kapitalizm i svoboda. Moscow: New Publishing House).

Grafov, D. (2018a). The prisoner’s dilemma and the free-rider problem in the environment of guanxi group loyalty. Southeast Asia: Current Development Issues, 3, 213-224. (In Russ.)

Grafov, D. (2018b). The economic model of the guanxi practice in China: comparative analysis. name Problemy Dalnego Vostoka, 5, 104-117. (In Russ.)

Huntington, S.P. (2003). The third wave: democratization in the late twentieth century. (Russ. ed.: Huntington, S.P. Tret’ya volna. Demokratizatsiya v kontse XX veka. Moscow: ROSSPEN).

Karl, T.L., Schmitter, Ph. (2004). Concepts, assumptions and hypotheses about democratization (reflections on applicability of the transitological paradigm for the study of post-communist transformations). Polis. Political Studies, 4, 6-27. (In Russ.)

Melville, A.Yu. et al. (2008). Politologiya [Political science]. Moscow: MGIMO, Velbi, Prospect. (In Russ.)

North, D.С., Wallis J.J., & Weingast B.R. (2011). Violence and social orders. A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. (Russ. ed.: North, D.С., Wallis J.J., & Weingast B.R. Nasilie i sotsial’nye poryadki. Moscow: Gaidar Institute).

Olson, M. (1995). The logic of collective action. Public goods and the theory of groups. (Russ. ed.: Olson, M. Logika kollektivnykh deistvii. Obshchestvennye blaga i teoriya grupp. Moscow: FEI).

Przeworski, A. (1991). Democracy and the market: political and economic reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. (Russ. ed.: Przeworski, A. Demokratiya i rynok. Politicheskie i ekonomicheskie reformy v Vostochnoi Evrope i Latinskoi Amerike. Moscow: ROSSPEN).

Rustow, D.A. (1996). Transitions to democracy: toward a dynamic model. Polis. Political Studies, 5, 5-15. (In Russ.)

Seleznev, P.S. (2014). Modernization of the post-Soviet Russia: from the democratic transition period to innovative development. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, 14(2), 43-49. (In Russ.) 

Content No. 4, 2022

See also:

Shestopal A.V.,
The Path to Democracy: Brazilian Experience. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No4

Afanasyev M.N.,
Clientelism: an Outline Historico-Sociological Account. – Polis. Political Studies. 1996. No6

Afanasyev M.N.,
Clientelism: an Outline Historico-Sociological Account (II). – Polis. Political Studies. 1997. No1

Sirotkina E.V., Karandashova S.A.,
Loyalty of Elites and Gubernatorial Elections: the Role of Pre-electoral Conflicts in the Voting Outcome. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No6

Peregudov S.P.,
New Russian Corporatism: Democratic or Bureaucratic?. – Polis. Political Studies. 1997. No2



Introducing an article

Polis. Political Studies
1 2008

Makarenko S.A.
Evolution of Nation-State: An Attempt of Deconstruction.

 The article text


   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991