Russia and political order in a changing world: values, institutions, prospects

Russia and political order in a changing world:
values, institutions, prospects


Torkunov A.V.,

MGIMO University. Moscow, Russia, tork@mgimo.ru


elibrary_id: 498974 |

Article received: 2022.07.02 13:03. Accepted: 2022.08.05


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2022.05.02
EDN: CYRKPH


For citation:

Torkunov A.V. Russia and political order in a changing world: values, institutions, prospects. – Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No. 5. P. 7-22. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2022.05.02. EDN: CYRKPH



Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of the most promising and popular strategies for the development of modern political science and the theory of international relations. In conditions of strategic instability, effective institutions of both national and global governance, designed to establish norms of collective action, are in demand. However, many of them, need to improve their efficiency. The author argues that the UN remains an key institution for international law, providing representativeness, regulation, and carrying out a political mission and a functional role. New structures are being created along with traditional international organizations, and rising powers are gaining influence. Contrary to popular belief, the rise of international institutions is not associated with a reduction in the role of the nation-state. The author believes that the idea that the threat is primarily posed by the so-called excessively ‘rigid’ states is flawed: at present, a kind of ‘conceptual rehabilitation’ of the effective states with a stable central government is overdue. In the context  of global turbulence, the greatest danger is not ‘tough’, strong states, but ‘weak’ and ‘fragile’ – insolvent – ones. The consideration of the regional dimension of modern political processes in the article reveals some evidence of the erosion of the vector of globalization during the massively increasing regionalization in its various manifestations, including macro-regionalization and glocalization. Within the study of methodological perspectives of regionalism, regional diversity and regional cooperation, both qualitative methods and quantitative strategies are used. Political governance and international relations, which represent a separate challenge and at the same time a new horizon of opportunities for political science, are the processes of comprehensive digitalization, including the use of big data (Big Data), artificial intelligence (AI) and other new technologies in political analytics. Big Data, artificial intelligence and other new technologies in political analytics is a new challenge and at the same time a popular prospect for political science and IR theories. This contributes to Russia's efforts to form a digital sovereignty-related agenda in this area. In order to stimulate interdisciplinary synthesis and empirical processing of large amounts of data on the subject areas of political science and international relations in Russia, it is necessary to form an integral scientific infrastructure, which MGIMO participates in developing with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia. Strengthening the value sovereignty of the Russian Federation in the face of external danger involves improving its axiological framework, within which it is difficult to overestimate the role of historical consciousness: it is historical experience that forms the coordinate system for assessing current events and justifying a reliable forecast of long-term development. The natural driver of this process is universities, which, in cooperation with local and regional communities, form vectors of socio-cultural activity and responsibility.

 

Keywords
Russia, USA, political science, theory of international relations, political studies, political order, Russian Association of Political Science.


References

Acharya, А. (2003). Democratization and the prospects for participation regionalism in Southeast Asia. Third World Quarterly, 24(2), 375-390.

Ahram, A.I., Kollner, P. & Sil, R. (Ed.). (2018). Comparative area studies: methodological rationales and cross-regional applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bigo, D. (2000). When two become one: internal and external securitisations in Europe. In M. Kelstrup, & M.C. Williams (Ed.), International Relations Theory and the Politics of European Integration: Power, Security and Community (pp. 171-204). London: Routledge.

Bobbitt, Ph. (2003). The shield of Achilles: war, реасе, and the course of history. London: Gardners Books.

De Lombaerde, Р., Sodeгbaum, F., Van Langenhove, L. & Baert, F. (2010). The problem of comparison in comparative regionalism. Review of International Studies, 36(3), 731-753. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210510000707

Gaman-Golutvina, O. (2008). The changing role of the state and state bureaucracy in the context of public administration reforms: Russian and foreign experience. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 24(3), 37-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523270701840449

Hone, К.Е. (2019). Mediation and artificial intelligence: notes on the future of international conflict resolution. Geneva: Diplofoundation.

Katzenstein, P.J. (2005). А world of regions: Asia and Europe in the American imperium. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Pгess.

Kostovicova, D., & Bojicic-Dzelilovic, V. (Ed.) (2009). Persistent state weakness in the global age. Famham: Ashgate.

Mahoney, J. (2021). The logic of social science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univeгsity Press.

Nettl, J.Р. (1968). The State as а conceptual variable. World Politics, 20(4), 559-592.

Ohmae, К. (2000). The invisible continent. four strategic imperatives of the new economy. New York, NY: Harper Paperbacks.

Simmons, Е., & Smith, N. (Ed.). (2021). Rethinking comparison innovative methods fог qualitative political inquiry. Cambгidge: Cambгidge University Press.

Sodeгbaum, F. (2009). Comparative regional integration and regionalism. In: Т. Landman & N. Robinson (Ed.). The SAGE Handbook of Comparative Politics (pp. 477-496). London: Sage.

Sodeгbaum, F. & Taylor, I. (Ed.). (2007). Micro-regionalism in West Africa evidence fгom two case studies. Discussion рарer 34. Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet.

 

Akhremenko, A.S., Gorelskiy I.E., & Melville A.Yu. (2019). How and why should we measure and compare state capacity of different countries? Theoretical and methodological foundations. Polis. Political Studies, 2, 8-23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2019.02.02

Baranovskii, V. (2021). Mezhdunarodnyi landshaft: epokha peremen [International landscape: the epoch of changes]. Moscow: Ves’ mir Publishers. (In Russ.)

Gaman-Golutvina, O.V. (2016). Political science facing the challenges of modern politics. To the 60th Anniversary of RPSA/SPSA. Polis. Political Studies, 1, 8-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2016.01.02

Hegel, G.W.F. (1993). Vorlesungen uber die Philosophie der Weltgeschichte. (Russ. ed. Hegel, G.W.F. Lektsii po filosofii istorii. St. Petersburg: Nauka).

Grishanina, T.A. (2021). Artificial intelligence in international relations: the role and directions of research. Bulletin of the Russian State University. Series: Political Science. History. International Relations, 4, 10-18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/28995/2073-6339-2021-4-10-18

Degterev, D.A. (2022). Value sovereignty in the era of global convergent media. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 22(2), 352-371. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-2-352-371

Istomin, I.A. (2021). Logika povedeniya gosudarstv v mezhdunarodnoi politike [The logic of states’ behavior in international politics]. Moscow: Aspect Press. (In Russ.)

Lagutina, M.L., & Mikhailenko, E.B. (2020). Regionalism in the global era: a review of foreign and Russian approaches. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 20(2), 261-278. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/22363/2313-0660-2020-20-2-261-278

Smorgunov, L.V. (Ed.). (2022). Politicheskaya ontologiya tsifrovizatsii i gosudarstvennaya upravlyaemost’ [Political ontology of digitalization and state governability]. Moscow: Aspect Press. (In Russ.)

Solovyev, A.I. (2021). Conflict facets of the cultural field of Russian politics. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, 61, 263-271. (In Russ.)

Torkunov, A.V. (2019). International studies: chaos or pluralism? Polis. Political Studies, 5, 7-18. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2019.05.02

Torkunov, A.V. (2020). Expanding the boundaries of the social-humanitarian knowledge of the world. RUDN Journal of Sociology, 20(3), 694-703. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2020-20-3-694-703 

Content No. 5, 2022

See also:


Alekseyeva T.A., Lebedeva M.M.,
What Is Happening to the Theory of International Relations. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No1

Konyshev V.N., Sergunin A.A.,
International relations theory: on the threshold of new «Great Debates»?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No2

Torkunov A.V.,
International Studies: Chaos or Pluralism?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No5

Kosov Yu.V.,
The Russian International Relations Science: to Acquiring the Image of Its Own. – Polis. Political Studies. 2005. No5

Inoguchi T.,
Political theory. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No3

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
6 2013


Sergeev V.M.
Political science of recognition

 Полный текст
 

Archive

   2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991