“Political Atlas of the Modern World 2.0”: formulation of the research problem

“Political Atlas of the Modern World 2.0”:
formulation of the research problem



Article received: 2022.12.08. Accepted: 2023.01.11


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2023.02.06
EDN: BZYWWX


For citation:

Melville A.Yu., Malgin A.V., Mironyuk M.G., Stukal D.K. “Political Atlas of the Modern World 2.0”: formulation of the research problem. – Polis. Political Studies. 2023. No. 2. P. 72-87. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2023.02.06. EDN: BZYWWX


The article was prepared within the framework of the MGIMO consortium of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation and HSE University from the grant for the implementation of the program of strategic academic leadership “Priority 2030”.


Abstract

This article gives an overview of the consortium between MGIMO-University and HSE University that was launched in 2022 to jointly implement the “Political Atlas of the Modern World 2.0” research project. Among the central objectives of this project is the study of the characteristics of states that determine their positions within the modern world system. An obvious challenge for the project team is that both the states and the system of which the states evolve are important, yet not only the actors are undergoing various transformations; both the states and the system are sources and targets of countless influences. A good solution to the problem in the context of this challenge is seen in the definition and systematic measurement of the characteristics of states, describing both the resources at their disposal and the features and results of their activities. As part of the research project, it is necessary both to re-conceptualize the previously proven indices of stateness, the potential for international influence, external and internal threats, the quality of life and the institutional foundations of democracy and to clarify the variables used in the indices, and to test new methods of analysis (for example, methods of Bayesian statistics, network analysis, etc.) of the ever-growing volume of time series data. Among other opportunities, this allows to assess the dynamics of states’ positions in the world. For example, efforts to re-conceptualize statehood are to account for the problem of state resilience, which is currently the focus of both academic and applied research. The development of software to visualize and provide access to the results of the project to representatives of the academic and expert communities and decision makers is underway. This includes the development of an online encyclopedia of political and socio-economic systems of modern states.

Keywords
consortium, atlas, MGIMO, HSE-University, state, world order, index, statistical analysis, resilience, stateness, threat, influence, quality of life, democracy.


References

Bull, H. (1977). The anarchical society. A study of order in world politics. London: Red Globe Press London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24028-9

Chandler, D., & Coaffee, J. (Ed.). (2017). The Routledge handbook of International Resilience. London: Routledge.

Cline, R. (1977). World power assessment 1977: a calculus of strategic drift. Boulder: Westview Press.

Haken, N., Woodburn, D., Gallo-Carelli, J., Cooper, A., Moglen, D. S., Faborode, J., Asfaw, Y., Wilson, W., Turner, P., Duvor, C., Nyukechen, E., Reece, N., Waterworth, M., Fiertz, N., Taft, P., Madden, J., Sample, E., Silveira, N., Tomusiak, A. & Miller, R. (2022). Annual report. Fragile states index 2022. https://fragilestatesindex.org/2022/07/13/fragile-states-index-2022-annual-report/

Hall, J.R. (1996). International orders. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Melville, A.Yu., Akhremenko, A.S., & Mironyuk, M. (2019). What Russia can teach us about power and influence in world politics. Russian Politics, 4(2), 137-167. https://doi.org/10.1163/2451-8921-00402001

Melville, A.Yu., Polunin, Y., Ilyin, M., Mironyuk, M., Timofeev I., Meleshkina, E., & Vaslavskiy Y. (Ed.). (2011). Political atlas of the modern world. An experiment in multidimensional statistical analysis of the political systems of modern world. Wiley-Blackwell.

Paul, T.V., & Hall, J.A. (Ed.). (1999). International order and the future of world politics. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. 

 

Akhremenko, A.S., Gorelskiy, I.E., & Melville, A.Yu. (2019a). How and why should we measure and compare state capacity of different countries? Theoretical and methodological foundations. Polis. Political Studies, 2, 8-23. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2019.02.02

Akhremenko, A.S., Gorelskiy, I.E., Melville, A.Yu. (2019b). How and why should we measure and compare state capacity of different countries? An experiment with empirical research. Polis. Political Studies, 3, 49-68. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2019.03.04

Fenenko, A. (2018). «Prusskie uroki» dlya Rossii [“Prussian Lessons” for Russia]. Russian International Affairs Council. https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/prusskie-uroki-dlya-rossii/?ysclid=lav5miojx5971548153

Melville, A.Yu., & Mironyuk, M.G. (2020). “Political atlas of the modern world” revisited. Polis. Political Studies, 6, 41-61. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.06.04

Melville, A.Yu. et al. (2007). Politicheskii atlas sovremennosti. Opyt mnogomernogo statisticheskogo analiza politicheskikh sistem sovremennykh gosudarstv [An experiment in multidimensional statistical analysis of the political systems of modern world]. Moscow: MGIMO University Publ.

Torkunov, A.V., Melville, A.Yu., & Mironyuk, M.G. (Ed.). (2009 (2012); 2012; 2012; 2014). Politicheskie sistemy sovremennykh gosudarstv: Ehntsiklopedicheskii spravochnik: v 4 tomach. T. 1: Evropa; T. 2: Aziya; T. 3; Amerika. Avstraliya i Okeaniya; T. 4: Afrika [Political systems of modern states: Encyclopedic reference book: in 4 volumes. Vol. 1: Europe; Vol. 2: Asia; Vol. 3; America. Australia and Oceania; Vol. 4: Africa]. Moscow: Aspect Press. 

 

Content No. 2, 2023

See also:


Melville A.Yu., Malgin A.V., Mironyuk M.G., Stukal D.K.,
Empirical challenges and methodological approaches in comparative politics (through the lens of the Political Atlas of the Modern World 2.0). – Polis. Political Studies. 2023. No5

Melville A.Yu., Mironyuk M.G.,
“Political Atlas of the Modern World” Revisited. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No6

Bolshakov A.G.,
Problematic statehood in the epoch of global crisis of national sovereignty. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No5

Patrushev S.V.,
The Modern World’s Arrangement. What We Have Learned and What We Should Like to Learn in the Epoch of Csisis. Listing One Book’s Pages. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No3

Melville A.Yu., Ilyin M.V., Meleshkina Ye.Yu., Mironyuk M.G., Polunin Yu.A., Timofeev I.N.,
Essay of Countries Classification. – Polis. Political Studies. 2006. No5

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
6 2019


Grinin L.Ye., Korotayev A.V.
Political Aspects of Contemporary Islamism

 The article text
 

Archive

   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991