Transformation of the political media space within the framework of the noospheric paradigm (to the 160th anniversary of V. Vernadsky)

Transformation of the political media space within the framework of the noospheric paradigm (to the 160th anniversary of V. Vernadsky)

Sharkov F.I.,

MGIMO University, Moscow, Russia; Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), Moscow, Russia,

elibrary_id: 478189 |

Kirillina N.V.,

Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), Moscow, Russia,

elibrary_id: 788358 |

Kireeva O.F.,

Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), Moscow, Russia,

elibrary_id: 796894 |

Article received: 2020.03.02. Accepted: 2023.04.10

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2023.04.13

Rubric: DIXI!

For citation:

Sharkov F.I., Kirillina N.V., Kireeva O.F. Transformation of the political media space within the framework of the noospheric paradigm (to the 160th anniversary of V. Vernadsky). – Polis. Political Studies. 2023. No. 4. P. 182-191. (In Russ.). EDN: FCWJDQ


Our century in the political, social and humanitarian context has revealed the urgent need to identify both the dysfunctions in the field of communication, and their possible causes and consequences. The study tests the authors’ hypothesis about the growing duality of the ongoing processes, which, on the one hand, are determined by the global communicative imperatives to expand the interaction space, ignoring national borders, and, on the other hand, by quite obvious centrifugal processes, which are caused, among other factors, by the desire to erect barriers along the lines of regional and territorial division. Observing the growth of antagonistic contradictions in allow for the possibility that the obvious polarization of opinions is not a consequence of the aggravation of real conflicts, but often their source. Taking into account the noted duality and complexity of the processes taking place during the transformation of the modern political media space, the authors offer general principles for diagnosing current political challenges from the standpoint of the noospheric paradigm, which goes back to the ideas of Vladimir Vernadsky, in combination with classical methods of studying communications.

media space, media space ecology, political communication, media policy, media environment, globalization, noosphere paradigm.


Barth, F. (1966). Models of social organization. London: Royal Anthropological Institute.

Barth, F. (ed.) (1969). Ethnic groups and boundaries. The social organization of culture difference. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

Bataille, G. (1991). The accursed share: an essay on general economy. New York: NY: Zone Books.

Baudrillard, J. (1981). Simulacra and simulation. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

Bergson, H. (1965). Duration and simultaneity. Indianapolis; Kansas City; NY: The Bobbs-Merrill Company.

Chardin, T., de (1959). L'Avenir de l'homme – essays 1920-52, on the evolution of consciousness (noosphere). In The Future of Man. NY: Harper.

Deleuze, J. (1990). The logic of sense. Columbia: Colombia University Press.

Durkheim, E. (1982). Social morphology. In S. Lukes (ed.), The Rules of Sociological Method (pp. 241-242). London: Palgrave Macmillan.  

Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Giddens A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Gosling, S., Augustine, A., Vazire, S., Holtzman, N. & Gaddis, S. (2011). Manifestations of personality in online social networks: self-reported Facebook-related behaviors and observable profile information. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(9), 483-488.

Habermas, J. (2001). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Band 2: Zur Kritik der funktionalistischen Vernunft. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

Kant, I. (1998). Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I. (2004). Metaphysical foundations of natural science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kjellén, R. (1916). Die politische Probleme des Weltkrieges. Leipzig.

Le Roy, E. (1929-1930). La pensée intuitive. Paris (t. I Au delà du discours – 1929; t. II: Invention et vérification – 1930).

Le Roy, E. (1956). Essai d'une philosophie première; l'exigence idéaliste et l'exigence morale, t. 2, Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

Levitt, Th. (1983). The globalization of markets. Harvard Business Review, May.

McLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg galaxy: the making of typographic man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: the extensions of man. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Park, R.E. (1952). The urban community as a spatial pattern and a moral order. The city and human ecology. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.

Sharkov, F.I., Silkin, V.V., Abramova, I.E., & Kirillina, N.V. (2018). Violation of information ecology in media space. RUDN Journal of Sociology, 18(4), 765-775.

Simmel, G. (1992). Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. In G. Simmel, Gesamtausgabe. Bd. 11. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

Tönnies, F. (2001). Community and civil society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Weber, M. (1968). Economy and society: an outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Wiener, N. (2013). Cybernetics. 2nd ed.: Or the control and communication in the animal and the machine. Martino Fine Books.


Asmolov, A.G. (2009). From we-media to I-media: transformations of identity in the virtual world. Issues of Psychology, 3, 3-15. (In Russ.)

Chugrov, S.V. (2017). Post-truth: transformation of political reality or self-destruction of liberal democracy? Polis. Political studies, 2, 42-59. (In Russ.)

Dzyaloshinskiy, I.M. (2013). Russia media space: ecological aspect. Theoretical and Practical Issues of Journalism, 1, 64-79. (In Russ.)

Kirillina, N.V. (2017). Symbolic exchange as a system characteristic of communication practices. in behavioral economics of the present and the formation of future markets – proceedings of the 7th International Sociological Grushin Conference, March 15-16, 2017, 1701-1703.

Kirillina, N.V. (2020). Sources of uncertainty and application of iterative approach in interactive communication campaigns (research and practice), Communicology (Russia), 8 (4), 172-179. (In Russ.)

Kirillina, N.V. (2021). On the role of the user and network fragmentation. Communicology (Russia), 9 (2), 41-49. (In Russ.)  

Krasnopolskaya, I.I., & Solodova, G.S. (2012). Group perception of a stranger in G. Simmel sociology. Sociological Journal, 4, 24-35. (In Russ.)

Sharkov, F.I. & Silkin, V.V. (2021). Genesis of sociology of media space. Bulletin of RUDN University. Series: Sociology, 21(3), 557-566. (In Russ.)  

Sharkov, F.I. (2022). Noospheric paradigm of globalization of the political media space. Vek Globalizatsii, 3, 33-44. (In Russ.)

Vernadsky, V.I. (1991). Nauchnaya mysl' kak planetnoe yavlenie [Scientific thought as a planetary phenomenon]. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)

Vernadsky, V.I. (2004). Biosfera i noosfera [Biosphere and noosphere]. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.) 

Content No. 4, 2023

See also:

Sharkov F.I.,
Visualization of Political Media Space. – Polis. Political Studies. 2016. No5

Shestopal Ye.B.,
Introducing the section. The human dimension of politics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No6

Sharkov F.I.,
The Convergence of the Elements of Political Media. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No3

Kulpin E.S.,
Russian modernization alternatives, or Meiji restoration, Russian Style. – Polis. Political Studies. 2009. No5

Fedotova V.G., Fedotova N.N., Chugrov S.V.,
Culture, Institutions, Politics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2018. No1

Screen version