Methods of neuroscience in studying world politics

Methods of neuroscience in studying world politics

Article received: 2023.02.15. Accepted: 2023.06.29

DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2023.05.09

For citation:

Lebedeva M.M., Zinovieva E.S. Methods of neuroscience in studying world politics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2023. No. 5. P. 141-152. (In Russ.). EDN: GAFBFW

The publication was supported by the MGIMO University development programme “Priority 2030”.


Neuroscience is actively developing and penetrating into social areas of scientific research. Compared to other areas of the social sciences, international relations and world politics have been less concerned with neurostudies, since the conduct of experiment, which is the main method of neuroscience, is limited. The research question of the article is the following: how does neuroscience open up new opportunities for the study of world politics and, in particular, international negotiations? Neuroscience is aimed at obtaining objective data. In the history of international research, there were periods of increased interest in objective research methods. The last period is associated with the fourth industrial revolution and the emergence, among other things, of neuroscience. The article highlights four areas of neuroscience in the field of international relations and world politics: 1) The role of cognitive and emotional processes, the problem of leadership, cooperation and conflict in international relations and world politics in decisionmaking and interaction; 2) Differences in the course of neuroprocesses among representatives of different cultures; 3) The possibility of transferring data obtained by neuroscience to international relations and world politics; 4) Limitations and emerging benefits of using neuroscience in international research.

neuroscience, objective research methods, international negotiations, international relations and world politics.


Agbanyo, G.K., & Wang, Y. (2022). Understanding cross-cultural differences in conceptualizing international trade patterns: a neuroeconomic perspective. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 16, 1-6.

Alós-Ferrer, C. (2018). A review essay on social neuroscience: can research on the social brain and economics inform each other? Journal of Economic Literature, 56(1), 234-264.

Aquilar, F., & Galluccio, M. (2008). Psychological processes in international negotiations: theoretical and practical perspectives. Springer Science + Business Media.

Atzil, S, Gao, W, Fradkin, I, & Barrett, L.F. (2018). Growing a social brain. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(9), 624-636.

Axelrod, R., Hamilton, W.D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211(4489), 1390-1396.

Boksem, M.A.S., De Cremer, D. (2010). Fairness concerns predict medial frontal negativity amplitude in ultimatum bargaining. Social Neuroscience, 5(1), 118-128.

Capraro, V., & Cococcioni, G. (2015). Social setting, intuition and experience in laboratory experiments interact to shape cooperative decision-making. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 282(1811).

De Almeida, A.T., Roselli, L.R.P., Morais, D.C., & Costa, A.P.C.S. (2021). Neuroscience tools for group decision and negotiation. In D.M. Kilgour, & C. Eden (Ed.), Handbook of Group Decision and Negotiation (pp. 315-338). Cham: Springer.

Dolan, T.M. (2016). Emotion and strategic learning in war. Foreign Policy Analysis, 12(4), 571-590.

Edinger, H. (2021). Theory of irrational politics: classical realist lessons on foreign policy analysis. International Studies Review, 23(4), 1181-1207.

Fisher, R., Ury, W.L., & Patton, B. (2011). Getting to yes: negotiating agreement without giving in. Boston, MA: Houghton Milfflin.

Franks, D.D. (2010). Neurosociology: the nexus between neuroscience and social psychology. Springer Science & Business Media.

Franks, D., & Turner, J. (Ed.). (2013). Handbook of neurosociology. New York, London: Springer.

Gammon, E. (2020). Affective neuroscience, emotional regulation, and international relations. International Theory, 12(2), 189-219.

Glimcher, P.W., Camerer, C.F., Fehr, E., & Poldrack, R.A. (Ed.). (2009). Neuroeconomics: decision making and the brain. London: Elsevier Academic Press.

Holmes, M. (2014). International politics at the brain's edge: social neuroscience and a new “Via Media”. International Studies Perspectives, 15(2), 209-228.

Holmes, M. (2018). Face-to-face diplomacy. Social neuroscience and international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jost, J.T., Nam, H.H., Amodio, D.M., & Van Bavel, J.J. (2014). Political neuroscience: the beginning of a beautiful friendship. Political Psychology, 35, 3-42.

Kelman, H.C. (2005). Building trust among enemies: the central challenge for international conflict resolution. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29(6), 639-650.

Knopf, J.W. (2003). The Importance of International Learning. Review of International Studies, 29, 185-207.

Lee, N., Broderick, A.J., & Chamberlain, L. (2007). What is ‘neuromarketing’? A discussion and agenda for future research. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 63(2), 199-204.

McDermott, R. (2011). New directions for experimental work in international relations. International Studies Quarterly, 55(2), 503-520.

Morris, M.W., & Mason, M.F. (2009). Intentionality in intuitive versus analytic processing: insights from social cognitive neuroscience. Psychological Inquiry, 20(1), 58-65.

Nye, J.S. (1987). Nuclear learning and US–Soviet security regimes. International Organization, 41(3), 371-402.

Price, R., & Sikkink, K. (2021). International norms, moral psychology, and neuroscience (elements in international relations). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Brain Res. Cognitive Brain Research, 3(2), 131-141.

Sanfey, A.G. (2007). Social decision-making: insights from game theory and neuroscience. Science, 318(5850), 598-602.

Sanfey, A.G., Rilling, J.K., Aronson, J.A., Nystrom, L.E., & Cohen, J.D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game. Science, 300(5626), 1755-1758.

Schutt, R.K., Seidman, L.J., & Keshavan, M.S. (Ed.). (2015). Social neuroscience: brain, mind, and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Soutschek, A, Sauter, M, & Schubert, T. (2015). The importance of the lateral prefrontal cortex for strategic decision making in the prisoner's dilemma. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15, 854-860.

TenHouten, W., Schussel, L., Gritsch, M.F., & Kaplan, C.D. (2023). Hyperscanning and the future of neurosociology. Sociological Methodology, 53(1), 139-157.

Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391-425.

Wright, N.D. (2015). The biology of cooperative decision-making: neurobiology to international relations. In M. Galluccio (Ed.), Handbook of International Negotiation (pp. 47-58). Cham: Springer.

Anokhin, K.V. (2021). Cognitome: in search of fundamental neuroscience theory of consciousness. Zhurnal vysshei nervnoi deyatelnosti imeni i.P. Pavlova, 71(1), 39-71. (In Russ.)

Bondarenko, D.M, Gavrilov, V.V., Dremlyuga, R.I., Klyucharev, V.A., Kononchuk, D.V., Kuznetsov, A.M., Lukin, A.L., Rozov, N.S., Chugrov, S.V., & Yurchenko, E.S. (2022). Modern neuro/cognitive sciences and humanities: what can they give each other? Oriental Institute Journal, 2, 140-167. (In Russ.)

Dezhina, I.G., & Nafikova, T.N. (2020). Global landscape of neuroscience and place of Russia. World Eсonomy and International Relations, 64(9), 37-47. (In Russ).

Glozman, J.M., & Krukow, P. (2013). The social brain: new understanding. Moscow University Psychology Bulletin, 2, 121-133. (In Russ.)

Lebedeva, M.M., & Zinovieva, E.S. (2023). International negotiations in the digital age. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 23(1), 144-156. (In Russ).

Naumenko, T.V., & Larina, Yu.M. (2020). Neuroethics and international security. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 27. Global Studies and Geopolitics, 1, 29-40. (In Russ.) 

Content No. 5, 2023

See also:

Chugrov S.V.,
Moscow University Bulletin. Series 25. International relations and world politics: 5 years on track. – Polis. Political Studies. 2014. No5

Lebedeva M.M., Melville A.Yu.,
Comparative Political Science, World Politics, International Relations: Development of the Subject Spheres. – Polis. Political Studies. 1999. No4

Introducing the «Moscow University Bulletin. Series 25. International relations and world politics». – Polis. Political Studies. 2010. No1

Gallarotti G.M.,
How to Measure Soft Power in International Relations. – Polis. Political Studies. 2020. No1

Manoylo A.V.,
Modern Political Conflicts: The Right for Interference. – Polis. Political Studies. 2017. No6



Introducing an article

Polis. Political Studies
2 2002

Self-Reflection of Politics (Review of the Materials of Two Journals’ Round Table: Voprosy Filosofii and Polis)

 The article text (электронная версия)


   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991