The versatile triangle: EU relations with the USA and China

The versatile triangle:
EU relations with the USA and China


Arbatova N.K.,

Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO), Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, arbatova@imemo.ru


elibrary_id: 261811 | ORCID: 0000-0001-6640-4532 |

Article received: 2023.08.21. Accepted: 2023.09.21


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2023.06.07
EDN: XXHFDK


For citation:

Arbatova N.K. The versatile triangle: EU relations with the USA and China. – Polis. Political Studies. 2023. No. 6. P. 83-99. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2023.06.07. EDN: XXHFDK



Abstract

Cooperation and competition between global and regional centers of power that seek to increase their influencer in order to more effectively realize national interests, are the natural state and essence of polycentricity of modern international relations. The course of the European Union towards strategic autonomy raises the question of its relations with two global centers of power – the United States, the EU’s most important ally, and China, its economic partner and competitor. Should the European Union become a full-fledged independent center, or should it play a supporting role of the most loyal ally of the other pole – the United States? This issue is at the heart of the modern EU strategy. The EU’s 2016 Global Security Strategy proclaims a common course for strategic autonomy, but leaves out the answer to this existential question, since the EU member States still fundamentally disagree on the ultimate goals of strategic independence.

Keywords
European Union, USA, NATO, China, Russia, European security, Euro-Atlanticism crisis, strategic autonomy, polycentricity of international relations, European values, economic competition.


References

Biscop, S., Dessein, B., & Roctus, J. (2022). Putin is creating the multipolar world he (thought he) wanted. Egmont Policy Brief, No. 156. https://www.egmontinstitute.be/app/uploads/2022/03/spb156-sven.pdf?type=pdf

Brattberg, E., & Feigenbaum, E.A. (2021). Southeastern, Central, and Eastern Europe: vulnerabilities and resilience in four countries. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/2021/10/13/china-s-influence-in-southeastern-central-and-eastern-europe-vulnerabilities-and-resilience-in-four-countries-pub-85415

Christiansen, Th., Kirchner, E.J., & Wissenbach, U. (2018). The European Union and China. Red globe press. https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/60896

Chrone, G.R. (1969). Background to political geography. London: Pittman.

Clarke, M. (2020). The neglected Eurasian dimension of the ‘Indo-Pacific’: China, Russia and Central Asia in the Era of BRI. Security Challenges, 16(3), 32-38.

Li Xing (Ed.). (2021). China-EU relations in a new era of global transformation. London: Routledge.

Lubina, M. (2017). Russia and China: a political marriage of convenience – stable and successful. Opladen, Berlin, Toronto: Barbara Budrich Publishers.

Mackinder, H.J. (1904). The geographical pivot of history. The Geographical Journal, 23(4), 421-437. https://doi.org/10.2307/1775498

Marshall, T. (2015). Prisoners of geography: ten maps that tell you everything you need to know about global politics. Elliott & Thompson.

Morillas, P, & Quero, J. (2020). The US, China, and the EU in a New Global Order: A World of Two or Three? CIDOB Opinion 606, January, 1-3.

Baykov, A., & Shakleina, T. (Ed.). (2023). Polycentric world order in the making. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5375-0

Savin, L. (2020). Ordo pluriversalis: the end of Pax Americana and the rise of multipolarity. London: Black House Publishing.

Thompson, J. (2019). European strategic autonomy and the US. CSS analyses in security policy. No. 248. https://css.ethz.ch/content/dam/ethz/special-interest/gess/cis/center-for-securities-studies/pdfs/CSSAnalyse248-EN.pdf 

Arbatova, N.K. (2019). Strategic autonomy of the European Union: reality or good intention? Polis. Political Studies, 6, 36-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2019.06.04

Arbatova, N.K. (2020). Will European Union become a global power center? World Eсonomy and International Relations, 64(6), 51-65. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-6-51-65

Arbatova, N.K. (2023). The Baltic states and the EU strategic autonomy. World Eсonomy and International Relations, 67(8), 26-36. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2023-67-8-26-36

Arbatova, N.K., & Kokeev, A.M. (Ed.). (2020). Strategicheskaya avtonomiya ES i perspektivy sotrudnichestva s Rossiei [Strategic Autonomy of the EU and Prospects for Cooperation with Russia]. Moscow: IMEMO RAS, Ves' Mir. (In Russ.) 

Lomanov, A.V. (2019). China-EU relations: between cooperation and competition. China in World and Regional Politics (History and Modernity), 24(24), 158-172. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2618-6888-2019-10009

 

Content No. 6, 2023

See also:


Arbatova N.K.,
EU Security: Micro-Aggression with Macro-Consequences. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No5

Arbatova N.K.,
Strategic Autonomy of the European Union: Reality or Good Intention?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2019. No6

Oznobishchev S.K.,
The new world and Russia NATO relations. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No3

Arbatova N.K.,
Climate threats – a new dimension of EU security. – Polis. Political Studies. 2022. No6

Neklyudov N.Y., Baykov A.A., Shchekin A.S.,
Crisis as practice: routinizing Russia – U.S. security rivalries. – Polis. Political Studies. 2023. No6

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
1 2020


Konnov V.I.
Science Policy Programs: a Paradigm-Based Analysis

 The article text 
 

Archive

   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991