Politics of France for obtaining European strategic autonomy in outer-space exploration

Politics of France for obtaining European strategic autonomy in outer-space exploration


Klinova M.V.,

Doctor of Economics, Institute for International Studies (IIS), MGIMO University; Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO), Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, marina.v.klinova@gmail.com


elibrary_id: 504473 | ORCID: 0000-0002-8548-9356 | RESEARCHER_ID: L-323-2017

Nikitin A.I.,

MGIMO University; Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO), Russian Academy of Sciences; HSE University, Moscow, Russia, an@inno.mgimo.ru


elibrary_id: 637132 | ORCID: 0000-0003-3509-6893 | RESEARCHER_ID: O-6521-2015

Article received: 2023.08.20. Accepted: 2023.12.11


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2024.02.12
EDN: UWVODI


For citation:

Klinova M.V., Nikitin A.I. Politics of France for obtaining European strategic autonomy in outer-space exploration. – Polis. Political Studies. 2024. No. 2. P. 165-178. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.02.12. EDN: UWVODI


The article was prepared in the framework of a research grant funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (grant ID: 075-15-2022-327).


Abstract

The development of such an immense strategic domain as an outer-space is based upon two pillars – civil and military. Space is a subject of competition between the most influential world powers, with the participation of state and inter-state structures, as well as private companies. Areas of panEuropean cooperation in the space sector are analyzed, including the participation of France and the EU and ESA, and the key and in some cases the leading role of France in these processes. The geopolitical significance of the outer-space in global competition and the evolution of the position of European powers and specifically of France in relation to the military component of space exploration are studied. Outer-space and cyber-space now are interpreted in Western military strategies as the fourth and the fifth “domains” of military operations, together with land-, sea- and air-domains. Western powers are coordinating and integrating their military-space activities. France and the governing structures of the European Union place an emphasis on assuring the strategic independence of Europe from the USA and from the technologies of “third countries” in space exploration, the military exploration of space included. The EU pays great attention to the formation and development of the “space economy” and the links between the state space programs with the private sector and private investments. The outer- space in the third decade of the XXI century has become a domain of everyday and constant activities of “space powers”, and because of the role of space technologies in the areas of communications, internet and cell communications, geo-positioning, TV-broadcasting, etc. widely interfere in the life of all other states on the planet. The militarization of the outer-space in different formats is actively progressing and requires active political efforts to ensure its peaceful use.

Keywords
outer-space, telecommunications, security, France, missile launcher, satellite, strategic autonomy.


References

Augier, J. (2018). MATRA: origine et fondateurs. Toulouse.

Gallois, P.-M. (1985). La guerre de cent secondes: Les Etats-Unis, l’Europe et la guerre des Etoiles. Paris: Fayard.

Henbest, N. (1993). The Satellite era. The UNESCO Courier, Jan., 10-14.

Klein, J. (2001). La France et la defense antimissile. Politique etrangere, 66(4), 827-846. https://doi.org/10.3406/polit.2001.5126

Krige, J. (1992). The Prehistory of ESRO 1959/60. From the First Initiatives to the Formation of the COPERSI. Noordwijk. European Space Agency.

Lefebvre, J.-L. (2016). Strategic spatiale. Paris: ISTE.

Moulin, H. (2006). La France dans l’Espace 1959-1979. Contribution d l’effort spatial europden. Noordwijk (Pays-Bas).

Pascallon, P., & Dumoulin, A. (dir.). (2009). Quelle politique de securite et de defense pour l’Europe? Paris: L’Harmattan.

Ramecourt, M. de. (2019). Services en orbites: une activite commerciale ddstabilisatrice? Nemrod-ECDS (Enjeux Contemporains de Defense et de Securite). https://nemrod-ecds.com/?p=4898

 

Arbatov, A.G. (2023). Nuclear metamorphoses. Polis. Political Studies, 5, 7-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2023.05.02

Arbatov, A.G., & Dvorkin, V.Z. (Ed.). (2009). Kosmos: oruzhie, diplomatiya, bezopasnost [Outer space: weapons, diplomacy and security]. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)

Arbatova, N.K. (2019). Strategic Autonomy of the European Union: reality or good intention? Polis. Political Studies, 6, 36-52. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2019.06.04

Baranovsky, V.G., Buzhinsky, E.P., Zagorsky, A.V., Nikitin, A.I., & Oznobishchev, S.K. (2022). Avoiding nuclear war. Problems of escalation/de-escalation of armed conflicts when approaching the “nuclear threshold”. Polis. Political Studies, 6, 114-134. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2022.06.09

Bogdanov, K.V., & Stefanovich, D.V. (2022). Global missile proliferation: challenges and solutions. Social Sciences and Contemporary World, 2, 63-77. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869049922020058

Klinova, M.V. (2011). Gosudarstvo i chastnyj kapital: ot teorii k praktike vzaimodejstviya v evropejskih stranah [State and private capital: from theory to practice of interaction in European countries]. Moscow: Magister Publishers. (In Russ.)

Oznobishchev, S.K., Topychkanov, P.V. (2012). Development of “Regional” Missile Potentials and Anti-Missile Systems. World Economy and International Relations, 12, 24-32. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2012-12-24-32

Petrunin, S.V. (1978). Sovetsko-francuzskoe sotrudnichestvo v kosmose [Soviet-French cooperation in space]. Moscow: Znanye. (In Russ.)

Sidorov, A.S. (2010). EU on the way to common defense policy. World Economy and International Relations, 12, 99-110. (In Russ.)Sidorov, A.S. (2023). Voenno-politicheskoe izmerenie evropejskoj integracii: poziciya Francii (ot de Gollya do nashih dnej) [The military-political dimension of European integration: position of France (from Charles de Gaulle up to nowadays]. Moscow: INION RAN. (In Russ.)

Stefanovich, D.V., & Porras, D. (2022). Space as a competition domain: threats and opportunities. Journal of International Analytics, 13(2), 95-106. (In Russ.)

Voronina, A.S. (2012). UN Committee on Space at the present stage: achievements, problems, challenges. Law and Politics, 5, 917-933. (In Russ.)

Yakovenko, A.V. (2002). Kosmicheskie proekty. Mezhdunarodno-pravovye problem [Space projects. International legal issues]. Moscow: Nauchnaya kniga. (In Russ.)

Content No. 2, 2024

See also:


Arbatova N.K.,
The versatile triangle: EU relations with the USA and China. – Polis. Political Studies. 2023. No6

Arbatova N.K.,
EU Security: Micro-Aggression with Macro-Consequences. – Polis. Political Studies. 2021. No5

Oznobishchev S.K.,
The new world and Russia NATO relations. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No3

Alekseyeva T.A.,
Strategic culture: evolution of the concept. – Polis. Political Studies. 2012. No5

Analytical Report by the Institute of Sociology, RAS,
Russia’s national security in experts eyes. – Polis. Political Studies. 2011. No3

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
3 2011


Arbatov A.G.
Nuclear reloading and international security

 The article text
 

Archive

   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991