Political (de)modernization of Russia in the 1990s: turning events and models of conflict dynamics

Political (de)modernization of Russia in the 1990s:
turning events and models of conflict dynamics


Rozov N.S.,

Institute of Philosophy and Law, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences; Novosibirsk State Technical University, Novosibirsk, Russia , nrozov@gmail.com


elibrary_id: 72298 | ORCID: 0000-0003-2362-541X | RESEARCHER_ID: K-5447-2017

Article received: 2023.12.04. Accepted: 2024.02.16


DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2024.03.10
EDN: MWVFRZ

Rubric: Russia today

For citation:

Rozov N.S. Political (de)modernization of Russia in the 1990s: turning events and models of conflict dynamics. – Polis. Political Studies. 2024. No. 3. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.03.10. EDN: MWVFRZ (In Russ.)



Abstract

A set of theoretical models are presented to explain the complex political dynamics in Russia in the 1990s.The parametric model is used to analyze the fluctuations of the political system in a conditional space defined by two axes: the scale of collegial division of power (CDP) and the level of state success. Major turning events as closely related structural changes shift the state of the political system along both axes. Political modernization occurs when success and CDP rise, while demodernization is defined as a decline on one or both scales. The contours model combines structure and agency processes and takes into account two contours of political dynamics. In the large - socio-political - contour, turning events affect grassroot structures and processes related to objective conditions of life, subjective moods, and behavioral attitudes of broad groups of the population. In the small contour (interactions of political actors with their rivalry and conflicts) the same turning events change the balance of power of the main players in national politics. The general principles of the dynamics of the CDP, state success in their interrelation, as a result of turning events as a consequence of the interaction of actors in the small loop under the influence of processes in the large loop are formulated. A step-by-step model explaining the natural shift to authoritarianism on the basis of these principles and under special conditions is proposed. Through these models, the mechanisms of conflict dynamics and socio-political processes of the 1990s in Russia are presented, when the processes of political modernization began to be combined with and then replaced by trends of demodernization.

Keywords
turning events, political dynamics, conflict dynamics, collegial power sharing, legitimacy, challenges and responses, collegial division of power, Russian politics in the 1990s..


References

Carothers, Т. (2002). The end of transition paradigm. Journal of Democracy, 13(1), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2002.0003

Rabkin, Y., & Minakov, M. (Ed.). (2018). Demodernization. A future in the past. Stuttgart: Ibidem-Verlag.

Hale, Н.Е. (2015). Patronal politics. Eurasian regime change dynamics in comparative perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Hellie, R. (2005). The structure of Russian imperial history. History and Theory, 44(4), 88-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2005.00344.x

Hellman, J.S. (1998). Winners take all: the politics of partial reform in postcommunist transitions. World Politics, 50(2), 203-234. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100008091

McFaul, М. (2002). The fourth wave of democracy and dictatorship: noncooperative transitions in the postcommunist world. World politics, 54(2), 212-244. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2002.0004


Akhiezer, A.S. (1997). Rossiya: kritika istoricheskogo opyta: sotsiokul'turnaya dinamika Rossii. Vol. 1. Ot proshlogo k budushchemu [Russia: critique of historical experience: sociocultural dynamics of Russia. Vol. 1. From past to future]. Novosibirsk: Sibirskiy hronograf. (In Russ.)

Collins, R. (2015). Macrohistory: essays in sociology of the long run. (Russ. ed.: Collins, R. Makroistoriya: Ocherki sotsiologii bol'shoi dlitel'nosti. Moscow: URSS).

Goldstone, J.A. (2015). Revolutions. A very short introduction. (Russ. ed.: Goldstone, J.A. Revolyutsii. Ochen' kratkoe vvedenie. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Press).

Khasbulatov, R.I. (1994). Velikaya rossiiskaya tragediya [The great Russian tragedy]. Moscow: Sims Publishing House. (In Russ.)

Klyamkin, I.M. (2007). Postmilitaristskoe gosudarstvo [Postmilitarist State]. In I.M. Klyamkin (Ed.), Rossiiskoe gosudarstvo: vchera, segodnya, zavtra [Russian State: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow] (pp. 16-22). Moscow: Novoe izdatel'stvo. (In Russ.)

Machiavelli, N. (2020). Il Principe. (Russ. ed.: Machiavelli, N. Gosudar'. Moscow: Akademicheskii proekt).

Pantin, V.I., & Lapkin, V.V. (2007). Politicheskaya modernizatsiya Rossii: tsikly, osobennosti, zakono- mernosti [Political modernization of Russia: cycles, features, patterns]. Moscow: Russkoe slovo Publishers. (In Russ.)

Ponimaya “devyanostye” [Understanding the “Nineties”]. (2013). Moscow: Znanie. (In Russ.)

Rogov, K.Yu.* (Ed.). (2021). Demontazh kommunizma. Tridtsat' let spustya. Genezis i ehvolyutsiya postsovetskikh politii [Dismantling Communism. Thirty years later. Genesis and evolution of post-Soviet polities]. Moscow: New Literary Observer. (In Russ.)

Rozov, N.S. (2008). Jointly divided power and the conditions of democracy in Russia in the making stage by stage. Polis. Political Studies, 5, 74-89. (In Russ.).

Rozov, N.S. (2011). Koleya i pereval. Makrosotsiologicheskie osnovaniya strategii Rossii v XXI veke [Rut and pass. Macrosociological foundations of Russia's strategies in the 21st century]. Moscow.: ROSSPEN. https://doi.org/10.12731/978-5-8243-1480-9. (In Russ.)

Snegovaya, M.* (2023). Regime change in Russia? Democratic transit, which did not happen. Forum fur osteuropaische Ideen-und Zeitgeschichte, 1-2, 119-135. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23928.42240

Shleifer, A., & Treisman, D. (2004). Normal country. Ecovest, 4(1), 44-78. (In Russ.)

Weber, M. (2016). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie. (Russ. ed.: Weber, M. Khozyaistvo i obshchestvo. Ocherki ponimayushchei sotsiologii. Moscow: HSE Publishing House).

Yanov, A.L. (1997). Ten' Groznogo tsarya. Zagadki russkoi istorii [Shadow of the Terrible Tsar. Riddles of Russian history]. Moscow: Kruk. (In Russ.)

Yeltsin, B.N. (1994). Zapiski prezidenta [Notes from the president]. Moscow: Ogoniok. (In Russ.)

  

Content No. 3, 2024

See also:


Kulpin E.S.,
The globalizing world and political modernization. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No3

Bolshakov A.G.,
Our political transformation: the completion or a pause?. – Polis. Political Studies. 2013. No2

Tikhonova N.E.,
Balance of State Interests and Human Rights in Perception of Russians: Empirical Analysis. – Polis. Political Studies. 2018. No5

Rozov N.S.,
Mechanisms of political evolution, the pattern of turbulence in the era of modernization, and the role of organized violence. – Polis. Political Studies. 2023. No6

Pantin V.I.,
Political and Civilizational Self-Identification of Modern Russian Society under Globalization. – Polis. Political Studies. 2008. No3

 

   

Introducing an article



Polis. Political Studies
2 2005


Shirikov A.S.
Transitology: the Lingering Farewell?

 The article text
 

Archive

   2024      2023      2022      2021   
   2020      2019      2018      2017      2016   
   2015      2014      2013      2012      2011   
   2010      2009      2008      2007      2006   
   2005      2004      2003      2002      2001   
   2000      1999      1998      1997      1996   
   1995      1994      1993      1992      1991